FORMER first minister Alex Salmond has accused the SNP leadership of a “brain-dead” response to the party’s General Election result.
The SNP won nine MPs when the public took to the polls last month, having won 48 in 2019.
In an interview with The Scotsman, Salmond said the SNP lack “fight” and people no longer believe the party is trying to secure independence.
He also hit out at External Affairs Secretary Angus Robertson (below), calling him a “fud,” following his meeting with a senior Israeli diplomat.
It was revealed this week that SNP membership numbers have fallen to 64,525, down from 73,936 since last year.
“It’s not the lack of progress that demoralises people, it’s the lack of any strategy,” Salmond said.
“It’s not the winning and losing, it’s the lack of fight. It’s not to have fought at all, that’s the disillusioning aspect.”
He continued: “It’s like being a football supporter. You go to a match – you don’t necessarily expect to win, but you expect the team to do their best [not find] that they look like they’d all rather be elsewhere.
“That’s what the SNP looks like just now. Therefore, it’s disillusioning for independence supporters, therefore people don’t want to stay as members.
READ MORE: SNP conference can be the start of long-overdue change
“I don’t think most people say, ‘I’m not going to be a member of the SNP because of Operation Branchform’.
“They don’t want to be a member of the SNP because they don’t think the SNP are trying to get independence.
“I would have thought that you would want some fairly radical shifts to change that.”
Salmond’s (below) interview comes after a new Norstat Opinion poll predicted the SNP would win the most seats at the next Holyrood election but fall short of being able to secure a majority.
The former SNP leader said that any “analysis or serious questions” about what went wrong at the election have been “totally absent”.
John Swinney is set to lead a General Election review at the party’s conference next week.
Salmond added: “The SNP are giving the impression of being – the leadership – of being virtually brain-dead at the present moment, and that’s very worrying.
“You would have thought there would be a reservoir of talent and ability and common sense which would take it to a different level.
READ MORE: Highlanders faces harder winter under Labour than Tories, SNP MP warns
“That doesn’t mean that every single person in the SNP is devoid of these qualities – of course they’re not.
“But they seem to be, as an organisation right now, to be devoid of making the shifts that have to be made.”
Angus Robertson comments
Salmond also hit out at Scotland’s Culture Secretary after he faced criticism for holding a meeting with Israel’s deputy ambassador to the UK Daniela Grudsky.
Robertson has since issued a statement and said it “would not be appropriate to accept any invitation for a further meeting”.
Salmond told The Scotsman: “I think Angus is a fud, which is a Glaswegian expression which means somebody with an over-inflated view of his abilities who tends to make mistakes, as he does.
“But then, of course, the point is why is Angus Robertson where he is? Is the SNP currently so devoid of talent that they can’t have somebody who doesn’t make elementary mistakes?”
He added that he believes Robertson should have been sacked after the meeting and said: “Angus Robertson is not the reason the SNP government is languishing where they are. He’s a symptom, not a cause.”
The Scottish Government has said it won’t meet with Israel again until “real progress has been made towards peace”.
The National has approached both the SNP and Scottish Government for further comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel