A LABOUR donor handed a top civil service job has quit the role amid allegations of cronyism.
Former banker Ian Corfield was appointed to a director role in the Treasury after gifting £18,000 to Labour politicians and working for the party in the run-up to the General Election.
His position would have commanded a salary of at least £95,000 a year.
But The Sunday Times has reported he will now take on an unpaid role as a Treasury adviser after accusations of cronyism – which saw the Tories accuse Labour of “hypocrisy off the scale” when it was revealed he had donated £5000 to Chancellor Rachel Reeves.
His appointment bypassed the usual civil service hiring rules, which can be waived in special circumstances for temporary appointments.
But the Civil Service Commission was reportedly not informed about his past financial contributions to Labour.
Corfield’s new role means he will no longer have the power to make managerial or financial decisions.
READ MORE: Keir Starmer to say 'things will get worse before they get better' in major speech
The Sunday Times reported that he will continue to work on organising the Government’s first international investment summit in London in October.
This will see the Chancellor attempt to drum up billions from foreign states and corporations and she has previously spoke of her ambition to use private capital to plug a £22 billion “black hole” in the public finances.
Labour have been hit with another cronyism row over the weekend after it emerged that a civil servant who began her career with Reeves at the Bank of England has been handed a significant promotion in the Treasury.
Louise Tinsley, who previously worked for Reeves before joining the civil service, has been given a powerful new role in the Treasury as director of special advisers and chancellor engagement, according to The Sunday Times.
The Treasury refused to tell the paper whether the post, which is a newly-created role, was advertised externally or internally before Tinsley was appointed.
Meanwhile, top Labour minister Pat McFadden (above) has said a major party donor may have a Downing Street pass.
Lord Waheed Alli, who has donated hundreds of thousands of pounds to the party, was reported by The Sunday Times to have been given a pass granting him access to Number 10 despite having no official role in Government.
READ MORE: SNP to win Holyrood election but Anas Sarwar to be next first minister – new poll
But speaking to Sky News on Sunday, McFadden said that Alli may have had a pass “for a short time” immediately after the election and could still have access to No 10.
He said: “I don’t think it’s unusual for people to have passes to attend political meetings if they need to do so.
“I don’t think he’s got the pass now but he may have had one in the past.”
Lord Alli, a television executive who was ennobled by Tony Blair in 1998, has donated more than £500,000 to the Labour Party and senior Labour figures over the past 20 years, including to Keir Starmer, along with providing clothes and accommodation for the Prime Minister.
He also worked as the party’s chief fundraiser for the general election, having been hired by Starmer in 2022.
It is rare for donors to receive a pass for Number 10, with access usually being restricted to civil servants, advisers and close family members of the Prime Minister.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel