THE SNP have said they are open to working with Alba or Unionist parties to pass a budget – as new research showed the majority of their voters would prefer the party to strike a deal with the Greens.
Alba have published research which found that only a third of SNP voters wanted them to work with Alex Salmond’s party.
A FindOutNow poll commissioned by Alba found that 28% of those who voted SNP in last month’s General Election wanted John Swinney’s party to work with MSP Ash Regan to help pass a budget.
Because her support would still fail to take the party over the threshold to command a majority, the SNP would still need to cut a deal with others to get a budget over the line.
The Greens have pointed out that they are more popular with SNP members and have the numbers to help their former power-sharing partners get a budget over the line without the need for more deal-making.
The survey, which polled 1505 Scots, found that across all voters the most popular option, with 46% support, was to work with Unionist parties including any combination of Labour, the Tories or the LibDems.
Most SNP voters said they wanted the party to strike a deal with the Scottish Greens, reminiscent of the Bute House Agreement which was collapsed by former first minister Humza Yousaf (above) earlier this year.
Some 62% of SNP voters said they would like to see the SNP make a deal with the Greens which included bringing back some of the former’s policies which have since been ditched by the Scottish Government.
But the survey found this was unpopular with many other Scots, with only 4% of Tory voters backing this option and less than one in five Labour voters backing the return of Green policies.
READ MORE: Keir Starmer slammed ahead of 'things will get worse before they get better' warning
An SNP spokesperson said: “The SNP will always work constructively with others to make a real difference to the lives of people in Scotland.
“Despite the huge financial pressure facing the Scottish Government as a result of Labour’s decision to continue Tory austerity, the SNP is focused on delivering on the priorities of the Scottish people – eradicating child poverty, promoting economic growth and making our public services sustainable.”
Alba Party deputy leader Kenny MacAskill (below) warned Swinney against bringing the Greens back into the fold – saying they “had their fingertips all over almost every single unpopular policy failure of the Government”.
The former justice secretary added: “John Swinney does not have his troubles to seek and although he may have replaced Humza Yousaf as first minister he did not change the parliamentary arithmetic.
“When I was a member of the Scottish Government it wasn’t always easy to pass a budget but we had the support of the public on our side and the opposition feared an early Holyrood election as we were governing competently and rolling out popular policies. This has not been the story in recent years. The Green Party have had their finger tips all over almost every single unpopular policy failure of the Government.
READ MORE: SNP to win Holyrood election but Anas Sarwar to be next first minister – new poll
“Bringing back Green Party policies might help the Scottish Government win a budget vote but it’ll result in them further losing the country.”
He argued that siding with the Unionist parties meant the SNP would be “held to ransom and they will pay the price at the ballot box in two years’ time”.
MacAskill said that bringing Regan onside would mean the Government would take “action on independence, make governing competently a priority and start focusing on the people’s agenda again instead of being stuck in the apertures of niche party political issues”.
But the Greens have hit back, saying the SNP did not need to “work with fringe groups whose public support is next to non-existent”.
MSP Ross Greer (above) said: “This poll shows that two-thirds of SNP voters want John Swinney to work with the Scottish Greens on a progressive policy agenda to deliver a fairer, greener Scotland.
“Green MSPs have delivered for Scotland both from government and opposition. We passed the emergency rent freeze, rolled out free bus travel for young people, cancelled school meal debt, allocated record government investment to climate action and scrapped peak rail fares.”
READ MORE: Alex Salmond accuses SNP of 'brain-dead' response to General Election result
He said the termination of the Bute House Agreement meant “we have seen the SNP roll back on this agenda and reverse some of these policies,” adding: “That's despite polling showing SNP voters overwhelmingly support our progressive agenda.”
Finance Secretary Shona Robison is sharpening her axe ahead of a statement to Parliament next month after the end of recess where she is expected to make the case for swingeing cuts to public spending because of “profound financial pressures”.
She has hit out at a lack of clarity from Westminster on the state of the UK public finances – and highlighted how the SNP had been left with “no choice” but to replicate Labour cuts like ending the universal Winter Fuel Payment for pensioners.
John Swinney will later in September unveil his first Programme for Government – also the first time an SNP government has had to outline their legislative agenda as a minority government in four years.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel