LABOUR’s “austerity 2.0” is set to go deeper than the Tories did, the Health Secretary has said.
It comes amid reports that Labour MPs are seeing their inboxes fill up with communications from “frightened” constituents raising concerns about the cut to the Winter Fuel Payment.
The i reported that one unnamed UK Government minister had highlighted the “level of anger” at the move – and said Chancellor Rachel Reeves was “going to have to show some flexibility”.
The payment had been available to everyone of pension age and was worth between £100 and £300 before Reeves took the decision to make it means-tested – leading to a £140-160 million cut to the Scottish Government budget and forcing them to also make the change.
READ MORE: SNP open to working with Alba or Unionists to pass budget, party says
Last Friday, energy watchdog Ofgem confirmed that the price cap on energy would rise by 10% to £1717 per year for an average household from October 1. Although this is lower than the £1834 price cap which was in place in 2023, the loss of the Winter Fuel Payment for many pensioners means they face paying out more from their own pockets.
Neil Gray, the Scottish Health Secretary who represents Airdrie and Shotts at Holyrood, said Keir Starmer’s Labour have “broken the ‘no austerity’ promise within weeks of the election”.
The SNP minister said: “At the General Election people voted Labour to get rid of the rotten Tory government and deliver change, instead we are getting short-changed.
“Labour’s choice to maintain austerity means pensioners are losing out on the Winter Fuel Payment and energy prices are due to rise by on average £150.
“The SNP have long warned that Labour’s choice to follow Tory spending plans – maintaining austerity – would cost households and these decisions highlight that a Labour UK Government is really no change at all.
“Austerity 2.0 will hurt folk even more than Rishi Sunak’s government did as Labour have gone further to deliver even deeper cuts, including cutting the Winter Fuel Payment for the first time.
“When we warned Labour cuts would be deeper than the Tories based on independent analysis, Anas Sarwar infamously told us to ‘read my lips’. Now we know we can’t trust a word they say as they’ve broken the ‘no austerity’ promise within weeks of the election.
READ MORE: 'Party before country': Kate Forbes savages Scottish Labour MPs over benefit cut
“Where are the new Labour MPs that claimed they would fight Scotland’s corner?
“It is clearer than ever that only the SNP will stand up for Scotland and fight for investment in public services rather than Labour Tory austerity.”
The comments come after Graham Leadbitter, the SNP MP for Moray West, Nairn and Strathspey, told The Sunday National that people in his Highland constituency face a tougher winter under Labour than they did under the Tories.
On Monday, Scottish Labour’s Anas Sarwar reiterated his support for the UK Government’s decision to cut the Winter Fuel Payment for millions of pensioners, saying he did not believe it should be a universal benefit.
Sarwar drew criticism after also claiming that UK Government cuts were “not related” to cuts in Scotland.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel