A NATURE charity has challenged the Scottish Government move to redirect money intended for restoring nature and improving biodiversity towards local government pay awards.
The development came after Finance Secretary Shona Robison said more cost-cutting measures are needed in order to balance the books, with £5 million from the nature restoration fund instead going towards pay settlements.
Now, Woodland Trust Scotland has sent a letter to Scottish Energy Minister Gillian Martin expressing their “surprise and disappointment” at the news.
READ MORE: Scottish Government's nature fund to be redirected to council pay awards
“Given the very small proportion of the Scottish Government's overall budget that is dedicated to nature restoration, to hear that £5 million of 2024-25 allocation is being diverted away from Nature Restoration for more general use is a serious disappointment for all who care about Scotland's nature recovery,” the letter read.
A Scottish Government spokesman said Robison had been clear about the “painful choices” which lie ahead.
The spokesman said: “Protecting and restoring our natural environment is key to addressing the twin crises of nature loss and climate change, and nearly £40m has already been distributed through the nature restoration fund since 2021.
“While capital funding of £5m from this year’s nature restoration fund has been redirected to fund the pay offer, it will be replaced in future years.”
But the Woodland Trust letter went on to seek further reassurance about the possibility of the restoration of dunning in “future years”.
“The NRF is as you know a vital component in enabling the work of restoring and expanding Scotland's Rainforest. We have been anxiously awaiting news of what funding will replace the NRF when this window ends. What we did not anticipate was surprise in-year redirection of funding from current allocations,” the letter read.
“Our sector is already reeling from the enormous blow of a £32m (41%) to the woodland grants budget this year which we know will set Scotland back from meeting its own woodland creation targets - vital for both net zero and for nature recovery.
“We would be grateful for your urgent personal reassurance that you remain committed to nature restoration as a mission of your government - and that no further cuts will be made to already-limited nature restoration budgets in the rest of this parliament.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel