ANAS Sarwar has been panned after he claimed that UK Government cuts are “not related” to cuts in Scotland.
The Scottish Labour leader made the claim on Monday – as he supported Chancellor Rachel Reeves’s decision to end the Winter Fuel Payment, which had been universal and worth between £100 and £300, for millions of pensioners.
The cut from the Labour government, made in an effort to begin to plug what Reeves called a £22 billion black hole in the UK’s finances, means the Scottish Government will not receive an estimated £140-160 million to fund the Winter Fuel Payment north of the Border.
Spending by the UK Government directly impacts on Scottish Government funding in this way due to the "Barnett Consequentials" system.
The SNP government said the cut had left it with “no choice” but to copy Labour and also make the benefit means-tested, stripping it back in a move which has rung alarm bells in the charity sector.
READ MORE: Richard Murphy: Why austerity in England means austerity in Scotland
But challenged on Monday, Sarwar insisted that cuts in Scotland were “not related” to cuts implemented in London.
In a clip reshared on social media by Scottish Labour's main account, an LBC reporter asked Sarwar: “[The SNP] say when Labour makes cuts, they have to do the same. I mean, that's correct, is it not?”
He responded: “Well, it's actually frankly embarrassing for a party that's been in government for 17 years, wants to blame a party that's been in government for around seven weeks. And in that time we are clearing up the mess left by the Tories, a mess that the SNP want to downplay …
“But the cuts that are happening in Scotland are not related to the £22bn black hole that Rachel Reeves set out in her statement.”
Labour cuts are all because of the Tories but any cuts having to be made by the SNP are all because of 'financial mismanagement'. Labour must think the people of Scotland are really stupid to believe rubbish like this. pic.twitter.com/qaiXxgu07Z
— Pete Wishart (@PeteWishart) August 26, 2024
Sarwar’s claim has been attacked in strong terms, with Pete Wishart, the SNP’s longest serving MP, saying: “Labour cuts are all because of the Tories but any cuts having to be made by the SNP are all because of 'financial mismanagement'.
“Labour must think the people of Scotland are really stupid to believe rubbish like this.”
SNP MSP James Dornan said that Sarwar’s “nonsense” was the result of “a subservient client media [who] don't sufficiently challenge him in his clearly unsustainable fantasies”.
Councillor Allan Casey, who represents Glasgow’s Dennistoun for the SNP, said the Scottish Labour leader was “now just blatant in his attempt to mislead the public”.
“He hasn’t got a backbone to stand up to his bosses in London in the face of Labour austerity which is now crippling Scotland’s finances,” Casey added.
Alba general secretary Chris McEleny shared Sarwar’s claims and commented simply: “Comical.”
READ MORE: Labour's 'austerity 2.0 will be deeper than Tories'', Health Secretary says
And Green councillor Anthony Carroll wrote: “The UK Government doesn't exist in a vacuum.
“Funding public pay rises through cuts and not taxing the wealthiest is trickling down to devolved government.
“Sarwar is promising to do skud all different if he was FM, and would just roll over even more for this Red Tory government.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel