HUMZA Yousaf has harshly criticised comments by Israel's foreign minister calling for a "temporary evacuation" of the West Bank.
On Wednesday, Israel Katz said that the country should consider removing people from the northern part of the territory to facilitate an "anti-terror" raid on armed groups there.
Katz's comments and Yousaf's response come as Israeli forces launch what they call a "counterterrorism operation" in the territory, which has seen refugee camps attacked.
READ MORE: Scottish Labour MP took all-expenses-paid trip to Israel funded by Zionist group
The former first minister responded to the comments in an Instagram Reel, where he said: "I have just seen the latest comments from the Israeli foreign minister, who in his words is calling for the 'temporary evacuation' of Palestinians from the West Bank.
"Who does he think he is fooling? There was nothing temporary about the forcible displacement and removal of Palestinians from their homes in 1948.
"There is nothing temporary about Gazans having to flee their homes as Israeli bombs rain down on their heads."
"The removal of people from their land, to be replaced by another people of different ethnic origin, is the very textbook definition of ethnic cleansing."
Israeli forces entered the West Bank on Wednesday, killing at least nine people in the northern part of the territory.
READ MORE: Scottish Labour politicians slammed over visit to Israel-linked arms manufacturers
The BBC reported that the incursion appeared to be a major operation, with four cities – Jenin, Tulkarm, Nablus and Tubas – targeted at once.
It is believed to be the first time since the second intifada, a major uprising in Palestine between 2000 and 2005, that several Israeli cities were targeted in this way.
Yousaf's in-laws were stuck in Gaza for an extended period of time last year after fighting began on October 7.
Later in the reel, he implored the international community to take action, saying: "How many more egregious breaches of international law does there have to be for the international community to finally do something?
"If international law is to mean anything, there must be the harshest sanction for those who breach it.
"Otherwise, international law isn't worth the paper it's written on."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel