LABOUR hires to the senior civil service will be probed, the Whitehall appointments watchdog has said.
Kate Owen, the Civil Service Commission interim chief executive, wrote to human resources directors across Government on Friday to request information about appointments “by exception” to the ordinary recruitment principles.
Owen said the data would “inform a short, independent review” of new recruits.
The move followed an alleged cronyism row in Westminster, which Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer pushed back on earlier this week and claimed was about having “the right people in the right places”.
READ MORE: Swinney can ‘realign’ SNP so it can take on Labour, insists Flynn
According to media reports, recent appointments to the senior civil service include Jess Sargeant, who previously worked for the Labour Together think tank before she took a role in the Cabinet Office, and Emily Middleton, a consultant who was named a director general in the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, and appears to have worked close to Science and Technology Secretary Peter Kyle in the months before the election.
Ian Corfield, who has donated more than £20,000 to Labour politicians in the last decade, was made a temporary director of investment at the Treasury but it has since emerged he would work as an unpaid adviser rather than a salaried civil servant.
Owen has asked HR directors to provide her with information about all appointments made during July and August which did not need oversight from her Commission, ahead of a “short report”.
She also wrote to heads of departments in a separate letter which read: “Given interest in a number of recent civil service appointments by exception and the importance of public trust in these appointments, the Commission has decided to undertake a short review of appointments by exception at delegated grades since July 1 2024 and the departmental processes in place to make such appointments under the recruitment principles.”
Owen began her correspondence with a reference to the law on civil service appointments, in particular that recruitment “takes place ‘on merit on the basis of fair and open competition'”.
There are some exceptions to the rule, according to the Civil Service Commission.
These include temporary appointments, secondments from outside the civil service of up to two years, and “highly specialist skills”.
A Cabinet Office spokesperson said: “All civil service appointments must follow the correct rules and processes. The Civil Service Commission is independent of Government and is able to conduct regular reviews of recruitment processes, in line with their powers as set out in the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010.
“We will fully support the Commission with their review.”
Starmer has faced questions about alleged cronyism after Lord Alli was given a pass to Number 10 Downing Street, despite not having a formal job there.
He said on Tuesday: “Look, if you take Lord Alli, he’s a long-term donor and contributor to the Labour Party.
“He was doing some transition work with us, he had a pass for a short-term time to do that work, and the work finished, and he hasn’t got a pass. That’s the state of affairs.”
The Prime Minister added: “I am absolutely determined to restore honesty and integrity to Government, because I think that is core to ensuring that people appreciate that politics can be a force for good.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel