THE COMMONWEALTH Games 2026 “won’t be funded by the public purse” if held in Glasgow, according to an official statement.
Event organisers continue the search for a new host city following the Australian state of Victoria pulling out of the running citing rising costs.
In an official statement, Commonwealth Games Scotland (CGS) Chairman, Ian Reid, revealed that over £100 million of the Victorian Government’s money has been offered to secure the future of the games.
CGS claims its financial plan for hosting the games is “innovative, cost-effective and sustainable” and would not require any government money to bring the Games to Glasgow.
READ MORE: SNP conference: Stephen Flynn gives verdict on election review
The update revealed that the Games “will be funded by private income rather than the public purse, with the majority of costs covered by the CGF, using money secured in a compensation negotiation with the Victorian Government following their withdrawal as hosts in July 2023.”
The statement also says it would be a "travesty" to miss out on the opportunity to have the games return to the country, and warned the Scottish Government that “should we choose not to step up and host, the future of high-performance sport in Scotland will be under serious threat”.
First Minister John Swinney stated this week that no public funds would be available for the games and added that the feasibility of the project was being considered, especially given the short notice.
The calculated cost of hosting the Games is around £114m. CGS claims private finance will make up the difference alongside cutting 10 sports from the event.
In the CGS statement, Reid said it would be “short-sighted” to turn down such a significant sum of money, which would boost the Glasgow and Scottish economies and has been deliberately created not to rely on the public purse at a time of economic uncertainty.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel