THE NHS in Scotland is set to follow England in moving to a "regional model" of providing gender identity healthcare for under-18s.
In a statement in the Scottish Parliament on Tuesday, Minister for Public Health and Women's Health Jenni Minto said the Scottish Government would be accepting the recommendations of a report by the Office of the Chief Medical Officer into the Cass Review.
The review spearheaded by Dr Hilary Cass looked into the provision of gender identity healthcare for under-18s by the NHS in England.
It made a series of recommendations and claimed that there was "weak evidence" surrounding the use of medical interventions such as puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones on children.
READ MORE: John Swinney hits out at the media in response to English riots
It led the UK Government to ban new prescriptions of puberty blockers for young people, with the NHS in Scotland following soon after.
The Scottish Government also commissioned its own multi-disciplinary report in the recommendations of the Cass Review and whether it had implications for Scotland, which was received by ministers just before the Holyrood recess.
Minto said: "The Scottish Government has accepted the findings of the report in full and work has started to implement its recommendations.
"One such recommendation is that gender identity healthcare services for young people are, and I quote: 'not provided in an adult sexual health setting (such as the Sandyford Clinic) but are provided within paediatric clinical settings, as with other age-appropriate services for children and young people.'
"The report also found that to ensure sustainable services a distributed network, or regional model, would be the appropriate delivery model instead of one site.
"We are actioning this at pace to address the immediate fragility of gender identity healthcare for young people and to develop a sustainable longer-term model."
Currently, there are four NHS-run specialist gender identity clinics in Scotland.
However, only one — the Sandyford clinic in Glasgow — deals with young people.
Tory MSP Rachael Hamilton asked Minto whether the Sandyford, which also provides gender identity and other sexual health services to adults, would be closed.
Minto confirmed that it would remain open for adult users "as it offers a wide range of sexual health services" but repeated that moving forward under-18s would no longer be seen at the clinic but in a "paediatric setting" instead.
READ MORE: Children in Scottish town hurt by 'out of control' seagulls
It comes after NHS Scotland's Gender Identity Service said it would no longer be accepting self-referrals, with people now only able to receive an appointment following a recommendation from a clinician.
Minto stated that this was also a recommendation of the Scottish Government's report into the findings of the Cass Review.
Research into the long-term outcomes of people in Scotland accessing gender identity healthcare is currently being conducted by the University of Glasgow with the help of grant funding from the Scottish Government.
Minto said that the first outcomes of this research were expected towards the end of the year.
The Cass Review has been subject to criticism from members of the British Medical Association (BMA), who have called implementation of its findings to be "paused" while it conducts a critique.
Members of the BMA's council recently voted in favour of a motion which asked the association to “publicly critique the Cass Review”, due to what it called “unsubstantiated recommendations driven by unexplained study protocol deviations, ambiguous eligibility criteria, and exclusion of trans-affirming evidence”.
A group of academics at Yale Law School also criticised the Cass Review, claiming it “obscures key findings, misrepresents its own data, and is rife with misapplications of the scientific method”.
However, both the UK and Scottish Governments have stood by Cass's findings, with John Swinney stating that a "multidisciplinary clinical approach" is being taken towards the reform of transgender healthcare in Scotland.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here