IT is the sixtieth anniversary of the Forth Road Bridge, and some in Scotland are celebrating.
Traffic Scotland led the way, sharing an upbeat video put to Stevie Wonder’s Happy Birthday on social media.
“Today we celebrate the Forth Road Bridge's 60th birthday – Happy Birthday!” the agency wrote, adding cake and party popper emojis.
Today we celebrate the Forth Road Bridge's 60th birthday - Happy Birthday! 🎉 🎂 pic.twitter.com/I130fLZNRO
— Traffic Scotland (@trafficscotland) September 4, 2024
But not everyone was in the party spirit. Certainly not the folks at BBC Scotland anyway.
Rather than celebrate the 60 years the bridge has stood for, BBC Scotland suggested it might just be about to collapse into the firth.
“Forth Road Bridge marks 60th anniversary – but how long will it last?” their headline ominously asked.
The article went on to say that there were “questions about the future of the old road bridge”.
It added: “Now one expert has told BBC Scotland News he expects the bridge will comfortably exceed its expected 120-year lifespan.”
Oh, well that’s ok then.
But the oddly negative framing didn’t go unnoticed.
Journalist Neil Drysdale wrote on social media: “This seems a very negative take on what is a really positive story about a marvel of Scottish construction and engineering.
“I still love travelling via the Forth and seeing that magnificent vista, with three wonderful bridges at the same site. It’s well worth celebrating!”
Longer than the Union...#ScottishIndependence #YouYesYet #SNP https://t.co/8Xidz7GIqv
— @DerekMackenzie.bsky.social (@DerekMackenzie_) September 4, 2024
Another user added: “So, in short, it’ll last for at least another 60 years. That’s not really what we’re invited to infer from your headline though, is it?
“It’ll be there for a lot longer than BBC ‘Scotland’, that’s for sure.”
A third added: “Is there ANY news story about Scotland that you can't put a negative spin on?”
But is the doom and gloom unique to BBC Scotland? Maybe.
In August, the broadcaster covered the 400th anniversary of the old bridge in Berwick, in Northumberland.
There wasn’t a hint of a question about how much longer it might manage to stand, despite it already being there for four centuries.
Perhaps they just don’t build ‘em like they used to.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel