THERE is “genuine concern” that the Scottish Conservatives will not unite behind the next leader amid a contentious contest, a former head of the party has said.
Tensions have reached a new level in recent days, with contender and former deputy leader Meghan Gallacher making a complaint to the party about one of its own MPs.
The complaint is understood to revolve around an accusation that Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk MP John Lamont threatened her career.
The candidate is reported to have been concerned she would be de-selected ahead of the Holyrood election in 2026 after the call.
READ MORE: Dozens of Labour MPs threaten to rebel over Winter Fuel Payment cuts
Lamont – who has announced his support for Russell Findlay in the contest – strongly denied the allegations, which he described as “defamatory and false” and added: “I am now considering further action including legal options.”
In the wake of the tensions, former leader Jackson Carlaw told the Daily Telegraph he is worried the party may struggle to come together behind the leader after the contest, which also includes MSP Murdo Fraser.
“There is genuine, genuine concern that the party is going to find it very difficult to come together after this leadership election, which we all have to do, because we have three excellent candidates,” he said.
“One of them will be elected leader. But the atmosphere is now becoming so toxic that I am appealing to people as a former leader, and as the oldest Conservative MSP, as someone who has not declared for any of the candidates, who is not tribally aligned, for people to wind their necks in now and allow the balance of this election to be conducted without further rancour and to be prepared to work together on the other side of it.”
He added: “That is not going to be the basis on which we can all pull together in a relatively short period of time to fight a major election where we’re the only party who are actually saying anything distinct or different, and where there has to be a proper alternative put to the people of Scotland.”
The former leader said it is “absolutely incumbent” on members to “stop this now”.
In a post on X/Twitter, Fraser described Carlaw’s intervention as “wise words”.
“The sexism, misogynistic bullying, threats of legal action and constant blue-on-blue attacks we have seen must end,” he said.
“Our members and supporters are rightly angered by this behaviour. This needs to be a contest of ideas and vision.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel