PROPOSALS to develop a disused World War II air base into a holiday resort have been thrown out by a Scottish council.
West Lothian-based Ground Developments Ltd had asked Fife Council for planning permission in principle for a complete regeneration and conversion of the long vacant Crail Airfield, which is on the east coast next to the fishing village of the same name.
If approved, the plans would have seen the site turn into a holiday hub, complete with a hotel, up to 91 holiday accommodation units, an open air museum, as well as retail and public event space.
Planners assessed the application and recommended that North East Fife councillors sign off on the in principle plans.
However, the committee voted eight to two in favour of refusal, siding with 136 letters of public objection.
It was refused based on concerns over road safety due to a lack of a viable second route to the site and the development’s potential impact on the road network within Crail.
“The development doesn’t enhance connectivity beyond Crail and it doesn’t improve life for the existing villagers who are there,” Councillor Alycia Hayes, who represents East Neuk and Landward for the SNP, said.
“In fact, it’s going to worsen life for them. All they’re going to experience is a much greater volume of traffic going through [the Denburn Narrow] bottleneck which already creates terrible problems, is poorly lit and in winter is a sheet of ice.”
It wasn’t considered a reason for refusal, but her fellow SNP councillor David MacDiarmid also raised concerns about “turning Fife into a holiday park” and neglecting the need for local houses.
He said: “What we really need is proper housing for the people who live here. If this had come up as a housing development I would say go for it – even if there were a few problems with the road – because we need houses.”
He continued: “It’s not tourism we need; we need houses for people to live in.”
Approval and refusal arguments largely hinged on the airfield access issue.
READ MORE: Plans for a brand new £18m train station near Glasgow approved
As it stands, all airfield traffic passes through Crail via Denburn Narrows – a single lane portion of Marketgate which forces traffic to give way through the burgh. From there, it goes down Balcomie Road to reach the site.
The Local Development Plan (LDP) specifically stipulates that any airfield development should provide an alternative route. Ground Developments Ltd looked at a few options to connect the site with the A917 north without success.
Planners argued that the plans would nonetheless be acceptable because the “surrounding road network along with the proposed road improvements could safely accommodate the development”.
However, councillors sided with community objectors and agreed that the development would cause an unnecessary impact on roads in and around Crail.
Tory councillor Robin Lawson said: “I can’t get over that there’s a requirement to have a second access to the site and the developer has just said ‘Oh, I’m sorry, I’ve had a word with the landowners and I can’t make a second access so I’m going to use Balcomie road’.”
He added: “Having all that extra traffic going through existing narrow Balcomie Road and the Denburn Narrows bottleneck within the village itself is ridiculous.”
Councillors debated the proposals for more than 90 minutes on Wednesday.
“By virtue of location, form and scale, the development would impact on road safety by introducing a significant number of additional vehicle movement to the locality, which would be considered excessive in terms of existing road structure,” the rejection stated.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel