KEIR Starmer has suffered the first parliamentary defeat of his premiership after peers voted to express their “regret” over mammoth cuts to pensioner benefits.
The Lords on Wednesday night passed a motion slamming the Government for axing the universal Winter Fuel Payment – and hit out at a “lack of transparency” about the decision, which critics said was rushed through Parliament.
The Prime Minister earlier in the day repeatedly refused to commit to publishing an impact assessment of the £1.4 billion per year cut – expected to strip 10 million pensioners of the benefit.
He has been criticised on all sides for seeking to “balance the books on the backs of pensioners” and the Tories highlighted in the Lords vote that the move came as Labour gave “above-inflation pay rises for unionised public sector professionals”.
The motion is non-binding on the Government, which passed the new measures through a vote on Tuesday.
READ MORE: Wes Streeting says 'fairness at heart' of Labour's decisions after fuel payment cut
Some 12 Labour MPs abstained on the motion, out of a total of 52 who skipped the vote. Just one MP Jon Trickett rebelled in earnest and defied a three-line whip to vote for a Conservative motion – backed by the LibDems and the SNP – calling for the cuts to be abandoned.
No MPs who defied the Government have suffered any official sanction, unlike the seven MPs who were suspended from Labour before the summer for voting to axe the two-child benefit cap.
The Lords motion was split largely along party lines, with Tory peers backing it and Labour peers – who are outnumbered by Conservative members in the upper house – opposing.
A separate motion, tabled by former pensioners minister and Tory peer Ros Altmann, which would have annulled the cuts failed after most peers abstained.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel