FLAMINGO Land’s plans to develop on the banks of Loch Lomond would make traffic problems in the area “dramatically worse”, the Greens have said as they pointed to the developers’ own impact assessments.
The warning comes just days before the Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park Authority board issues its final decision on whether the theme park will be allowed to go ahead with its Lomond Banks proposals.
The plans – which have been recommended for refusal by park officials – would see a resort built at Balloch, including two hotels, 100 self-catering lodges, 21 apartments in a refurbished Woodbank House, a monorail, a waterpark, restaurants, a pub and craft brewery, and a retail area.
Locals have raised concerns about the impact on traffic congestion in the area, which is already notorious for long delays, especially around the A82 Stoneymollan roundabout.
READ MORE: What do locals think of Flamingo Land's plans to develop on Loch Lomond?
Green MSP Ross Greer, who has been leading his party’s campaign against the development, pointed to assessments from engineering consultancy Stantec and commissioned by Flamingo Land about how the development could impact traffic.
One assessment, conducted in February, concluded that at maximum capacity 82 “passenger car units” (PCUs) could queue between the Stoneymollan roundabout and the nearby Old Luss Road roundabout – which under the development plans would become a key access point.
The assessment said that queues of 77 cars could be projected to occur between the two roundabouts. As this was five below maximum capacity, it concluded that "at no point will the queue extend back to the Stoneymollan roundabout junction".
Elsewhere, the assessment said the development could was “forecast to generate 146 two-way trips (arrivals and departures) during the weekday morning peak hour and 253 two-way trips during the weekday evening peak hour”.
“In addition, the proposed development is forecast to generate a total of 167 two-way trips during a Saturday peak hour,” it added.
In March, Lomond Banks said it had reached an agreement with Transport Scotland to address acknowledged “concern” around the impact of the development on congestion issues in the area.
Developers said they would ensure they were “directly supporting and prioritising Transport Scotland’s proposals for upgrades to the Stoneymollan roundabout” in a bid to ease congestion.
Greer said the extra traffic would make the congestion in the notoriously troublesome area “dramatically worse”.
“Cramming an extra 250 extra cars an hour onto already congested roads around the south and west of Loch Lomond would be disastrous for local residents, visitors and for the environment,” the West of Scotland MSP said.
“These ridiculous mega-resort plans would see Balloch overwhelmed on any day with a decent weather forecast. Local residents already struggle to get in and out of their own community on such busy days. Flamingo Land’s own traffic assessment shows that their plans would make the problems on and around the A82 dramatically worse.
“This report is yet another glaring reason why the park board must reject such daft plans on Monday. Not only would it be devastating for our local environment, it would also be harmful for the people who live in Balloch and other local communities.”
READ MORE: Flamingo Land plans 'weaponised as political football', claims developer
He added: “The park authority rightly say they want to reduce car journeys within the park, both to help tackle the climate crisis and to improve conditions on local roads. If approved, Flamingo Land would do the opposite.”
Jim Paterson, the development director for Lomond Banks, said: “We have engaged extensively with local residents and businesses over the past few years and have listened carefully to all concerns raised to ensure our proposals address these as much as possible.
“Transport issues around Loch Lomond pre-date our involvement and that is why we considered it vitally important to formalise a legally binding agreement with Transport Scotland to help prioritise its proposed upgrades for Stoneymollan roundabout to mitigate any impact, should our plans progress.
“All statutory consultees including the National Park Planning officers report are satisfied with the traffic impact assessments we have conducted.”
The national park board will issue its final decision on Monday September 16. Developers will still be able to appeal to Scottish Ministers if the plans are rejected.
The Greens have set up a petition opposing the plans which has gathered more than 150,000 signatures, but Paterson called that petition a “sham” and insisted there is “simply no way to validate the numbers”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel