THE chief executive of the Edinburgh Rape Crisis Centre (ERCC) has stood down after a review found it had failed to protect women-only spaces.
Trans woman Mridul Wadhwa resigned following a Rape Crisis Scotland report which found she failed to behave professionally while head of the ERCC.
The investigation, which was carried out by an independent consultant, found Wadhwa “did not understand the limits of her authority” and that the needs of survivors were not prioritised.
READ MORE: Poll: Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves popularity plummets
A review had been sparked after an employment tribunal found a counsellor with gender-critical views had been unfairly constructively dismissed.
The charity has paused new referrals to the centre and said it was “extremely concerned” women-only spaces had not been protected.
A statement from the ERCC said: “Mridul has stood down from her role as CEO of ERCC. Recruitment of a new CEO will happen in due course.
“We are committed to delivering excellence while taking on board the recommendations from the independent review to ensure we place survivors voices at the heart of our strategy.
“We are in daily communication with Rape Crisis Scotland, have met their urgent demands and are currently implementing the recommendations in the report.
READ MORE: Alex Salmond: David Cameron was 's******g himself' over indy vote
“We will continue to work alongside RCS to ensure our services not only meet but exceed the National Service Standards.”
The review found the charity experienced a number of difficulties, including a restructuring of the service during the pandemic as well as a series of board and trustee changes.
It said some basic systems were not robust which “did not help the organisation manage situations well” and that this included a strategy which “did not put survivors first” as well as a failure to protect women-only spaces.
In its recommendations, the review said the Edinburgh centre should take advice from Rape Crisis Scotland on the definition of “woman” and publicise this within the service.
The report said women-only spaces “must be protected and clearly publicised” but also acknowledged the centre still continued to “deliver high-quality services to a significant number of people”.
People are still able to self-refer themselves to the charity.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel