THE SNP government has refused to publish the minutes or agenda from Angus Robertson’s controversial meeting with the Israeli deputy ambassador.
On Friday, The Ferret reported that a freedom of information request seeking the minutes and agenda had been rebuffed, with the Government claiming that publication could risk damaging the “good and honest relations with states they choose to engage with”.
A spokesperson for the SNP administration further said it was a “requirement of international relations that confidentiality is not breached”.
However, Scottish Green co-leader Patrick Harvie has said there is “no legitimate reason for refusing to publish details” of the meeting.
Thank you @AngusRobertson for welcoming us to wonderful Scotland.
— Daniela Grudsky (@DanielaGrudsky) August 12, 2024
Discussed the unique commonalities between 🇮🇱-🏴 and also emphasized the urgent need to bring back our 115 hostages.
Looking forward to cooperating in the fields of technology, culture and renewable energy. pic.twitter.com/sh2KeqRa9j
External Affairs Secretary Robertson met with Israeli deputy ambassador Daniela Grudsky on August 8 however posts made on social media by Grudsky about the meeting on August 12 sparked criticism.
The backlash saw Robertson forced to issue a statement amid calls for him to step down from the Cabinet. Although he stopped short of apologising for attending the meeting, the SNP minister did say sorry for not having discussions “strictly limited to the need for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and an end to the appalling loss of life in the region”.
Speaking on Friday, Green MSP Harvie said that the Scottish Government was “hiding” the agenda of the meeting.
“It's astonishing that the Scottish Government thought that a meeting with a senior representative for a government that is inflicting genocide would be appropriate, and I can see no legitimate reason for refusing to publish details of it,” he said. “The refusal should be immediately challenged.
READ MORE: Angus Robertson pulls out of book festival appearance amid Israeli meeting row
“There is nothing ‘good and honest’ about secret meetings like this. It is completely unacceptable to offer legitimacy to war criminals and to give them a smiling photo-op.
“The Cabinet Secretary for External Affairs has claimed that the meeting was used to discuss the assault on Gaza, but by hiding the agenda from public scrutiny, there is no way to tell what was said or where in the agenda it fell.
“The Scottish Greens have demanded an end to public grants and subsidies to companies arming Israel and those that are complicit in the illegal occupation of the West Bank, but the SNP has failed to take action.
“It is time for the Scottish Government to come clean, publish the agenda and allow scrutiny of this secretive meeting.”
READ MORE: 'Have some shame': SNP members confront Angus Robertson over Israel meeting
A Scottish Government spokesperson told The Ferret: “The meeting request from the Israeli UK deputy ambassador was accepted on the basis it would provide an opportunity to convey the Scottish Government’s consistent and unwavering position on the need for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza. This position was made clear by the Cabinet Secretary for External Affairs during the meeting.
“The Scottish Government remains committed to an immediate ceasefire, the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages, an end to UK arms sales to Israel and will continue to press the UK Government to recognise a sovereign Palestinian state, as part of a two-state solution to secure lasting peace in the region.
“It is a requirement of international relations that confidentiality is not breached. That is why the Freedom of Information legislation includes provisions to exempt material that would prejudice substantially relations between the UK and any other state. This is the case in relation to this minute.”
This story was updated to reflect that the meeting between Robertson and Grudsky was not first revealed by Grudsky's social media posts.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel