THE latest in a long series of delays to a late and over-budget ferry is “a matter of great regret," John Swinney has said.
The Glen Sannox and its sister ship the Glen Rosa are being built at the publicly owned Ferguson Marine shipyard in Port Glasgow, but have faced years of issues.
On Thursday, the yard’s interim chief executive John Petticrew said it would not be able to meet the previously announced target of September 30, with a fuel issue pushing the date back by around two weeks.
READ MORE: Delivery of delayed Glen Sannox ferry pushed back again
The liquefied natural gas (LNG) required to run the ferries requires a cooling system to keep it around minus 160C, but the yard has had trouble reaching the required temperature, leading to delays.
The two vessels will eventually serve the west coast of Scotland when they enter service after delivery to CalMac, but were due to be completed in 2018 at a cost of just £97 million.
Six years and hundreds of millions of pounds later, the ferries are yet to be handed over.
Speaking to the PA news agency on Friday, Swinney said: “There’s a technical issue that Ferguson Marine have identified about the Glen Sannox, which they believe will take a couple of weeks to resolve, delaying the handover of the vessel from the end of September to the middle of October.
“Obviously, that is unwelcome, but I have been assured the company is focused on making sure it meets this deadline.”
Pushed on what ministers can do to ensure there is no further slippage at the nationalised yard, the First Minister said: “The vessels are being built by Ferguson Marine, it’s Ferguson Marine’s responsibility to deliver those vessels.
“It’s obviously a matter of great regret that there has been a further delay and the company has got to be focused on ensuring it delivers the vessels within the time frame that’s been promised, which is vital for islanders.
“Over the course of the next two years we will, of course, boost the ferry fleet by six new vessels as a consequence of decisions taken by the Government.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel