A TRADE union is urging the Scottish Government to drop its opposition to new nuclear energy and claimed Scotland is “missing the opportunities that come with nuclear expansion”.
Currently, Scotland has just one active nuclear power plant at Torness in East Lothian, which is due to be closed by 2028.
However, ministers have maintained that Scotland does not need new nuclear energy plants due to an abundance of renewables and concerns about the timescale, cost and safety of such infrastructure.
Now, in a letter to Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes and Net Zero Secretary Gillian Martin, GMB Scotland policy and external relations officer Rory Steel called on the Scottish Government to reconsider its opposition.
READ MORE: Are Labour planning to block SNP from key Westminster committee?
“Scotland is missing the opportunities that come with nuclear expansion," said Steel.
“The Scottish Government’s continued block on new nuclear energy is forcing the sector into decline despite the benefits it brings to meeting net zero targets, energy security and high skilled, high-paid employment to thousands.
“The jobs promised through the just transition have not materialised.”
He continued: “If new nuclear sites are being built in Scotland, then the work has to be done here.
“According to the ONS [Office for National Statistics], each nuclear job supports a further 2.3 jobs in the wider economy.
“This ‘multiplier effect’ is the greatest of any part of the low carbon and renewable energy economy (LCREE), and it is significantly higher than investment in wind power can deliver due to the strong nuclear supply chain.”
Construction on the UK’s newest nuclear infrastructure, Hinkley Point C in Somerset, began in 2017.
It was set to open in 2027 but earlier this year owner EDF announced that it was unlikely to be operational before 2030 due to delays and spiralling costs.
The site was expected to cost up to £26 billion but overall costs have since been revised and could stretch to up to £34 billion.
Still, the Labour-affiliated union said decades-long timescales shouldn’t deter ministers.
READ MORE: Stephen Flynn: Both sides of debate should chart course to indyref2
“This is no quick fix and will take decades, but that means there is an even greater imperative to begin work as quickly as possible,” said GMB Scotland secretary Louise Gilmour.
“We must make the plans and investments now to meet tomorrow’s targets and if Scotland is at all serious about net zero, then ministers must reconsider nuclear and exploit its potential to reduce emissions and deliver stable and secure energy.
“Hunterston and Torness offer us the opportunity to expand and create low carbon energy and highly-paid jobs. Those jobs are already being created and the economic benefits seized elsewhere on these islands and Scotland must no longer drag our feet.”
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: “New nuclear power is expensive, will take years to become operational and involves significant environmental concerns – not least the long-term disposal and management of radioactive waste.
“Rather than waste further money on nuclear, the Scottish Government has been consistently clear that it makes far greater economic and environmental sense to make greater use of renewable electricity generation.
“We are embracing renewables, hydrogen and carbon capture and storage to drive economic growth, support green jobs and deliver secure, affordable and clean energy for Scotland.
“Our upcoming energy strategy and just transition plan will set out how we will support workers to take advantage of the enormous opportunities offered by becoming a net zero economy.”
It comes after bosses at Grangemouth oil refinery confirmed the site will close by next summer with around four-fifths of the workforce set to lose their jobs.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel