AN exclusivity deal between a developer and the Scottish Government’s commercial arm should end if plans for Loch Lomond are rejected, the Scottish Greens have said.
The Loch Lomond and Trossachs National Park Authority will meet on Monday to decide on the controversial development on the banks of the Loch.
The Greens have led a campaign against the development, which will include two hotels and more than 100 self-catering lodges as well as a waterpark and other amenities.
A similar project was rejected by the authority in 2019 but was re-submitted by Yorkshire-based theme park operator Flamingo Land in 2022.
Under the terms of an agreement with Scottish Enterprise, the firm has exclusive rights to develop the site.
READ MORE: Union claims Scotland 'missing out' due to nuclear energy opposition
But Green MSP Ross Greer has tabled a motion in Holyrood calling for the end of the deal should the plans be rejected on Monday, as well as urging ministers to re-assess the future of such agreements.
“The threat of this garish and destructive mega-resort has been hanging over the residents of Balloch for far too long,” he said.
“If Flamingo Land’s proposal is once again rejected, then their grip over the area must be ended and the exclusivity agreement finally terminated. It absolutely cannot be extended again.
“The agreement should never have been renewed in 2020 after Flamingo Land’s first application was roundly condemned by residents and experts alike.
“As a result of that error of judgement by Scottish Enterprise, residents have had to put up with a further four years of a developer trying to force its daft and destructive plans on their community.
“The outrage this has caused right across the country is clear from the record number of objections that have been submitted.
“Loch Lomond is an iconic, world-renowned location, so it hasn’t surprised anyone familiar with the area that so many people have joined local residents in the campaign to save it.”
Officials at the Authority recommended earlier this month that the development not go ahead, but Jim Paterson, the development director of the project, said he believed the decision was “heavily influenced by the constant misinformation that has been peddled by the various activists, parties and campaign groups”.
“When you drill down to what this development is – it’s a sympathetic mix of hotels and woodland lodges and associated leisure facilities, utilising an area of West Riverside which has wrongly been quoted as ‘the last piece of land in public ownership around the banks of Loch Lomond’,” he said.
READ MORE: Winter Fuel Payment: 780,000 pensioners to lose out due to UK cuts
“No theme parks, no flamingos, but instead, a sustainable world-class destination that will help support Scotland’s tourism industry and job market for many years to come. West Riverside was on the market and openly available for sale long before we became involved.”
A Scottish Enterprise spokesman said: “Scottish Enterprise has had a legally-binding exclusivity agreement, and then latterly a legally-binding conditional missive, in place with the proposed developers since they were selected as the preferred bidder following an open marketing process.
“The planning proposal is now going through the regulatory process, which has included extensive public consultation, and it would not be appropriate for us to comment further on the outcome of that process while it is ongoing.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel