A SCOTTISH Labour MP has admitted that the majority of his constituents are angry that he voted to cut the universal Winter Fuel Payment for pensioners.
Michael Shanks, a UK Government energy minister who represents Rutherglen at Westminster, told the BBC’s Sunday Show there was “no doubt” that the people who elected him were angry at how Labour had acted.
However, Shanks insisted that Labour had not made a “mistake” in deciding to cut the Winter Fuel Payment, and warned that they would be making further cuts moving forward.
Before the General Election, all pensioners could expect to receive a payment of between £100 and £300 to help cover fuel bills through the winter. However, soon after coming to power Labour cut the payment back, making it means-tested in a move which charities have warned risks pushing people into poverty.
At Westminster last week, 35 of Scotland’s 37 Labour MPs voted to support the cut, while two abstained.
READ MORE: Labour failed to assess impact of pensioner fuel payment cut, Keir Starmer says
Appearing on the BBC’s Sunday Show, Shanks was asked what his “email inbox [had] been like since you voted to take money away from pensioners”.
He responded: “There’s no doubt at all constituents are angry about this decision.
“I also have a number of constituents who support the decision, incidentally, but it's fair to say the majority are angry about it.”
He went on: “This is not a decision certainly we were planning at all leading up to coming into government, and it's certainly not a decision any of us wanted to make. None of us voted happily for this decision this week.
“It's necessary because of the economic mess we've inherited from the previous government, and it is important to say this £22 billion black hole was not expected.
“We expected a gap between public spending and income, but this is a £22bn black hole in year spending.”
Shanks then called the previous universal Winter Fuel Payment “an extremely un-means-tested benefit”, before saying: “We want to ramp up the number of people who are eligible for a pension credit, which a third of people who are eligible don't claim it.”
Pension credit is available to anyone of pension age in England, Scotland or Wales and tops up people’s weekly income to at least £218.15 if they’re single or £332.95 if they have a partner.
READ MORE: Keir Starmer suffers first parliamentary defeat as Lords slam pensioner benefit cut
Asked if cutting the Winter Fuel Payment had been the “first big unforced error by the Labour government”, Shanks insisted it had not been a mistake and said that further cuts would be coming down the line.
“I think it's been a very, very difficult week,” he told the BBC. “I think it was a challenging decision.
“I think Keir Starmer has made very clear we're not going to duck difficult decisions, and it's worth seeing in a £22 billion pound black hole, this is just part of the challenging decisions we're going to have to make.”
He added: “I don't think it's been a mistake.
“I think we could communicate the decision more clearly to be able to explain why we, in fact, have ended up where we are. But, no, I don't believe it is [a mistake].”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel