THE Jewish Chronicle is facing a crisis, with big name columnists resigning after the newspaper was found to have published fake stories about Gaza and Hamas.
Editor Jake Wallis Simons claimed on Sunday to have been “deceived” by the false stories from a freelance journalist identified as “Elon Perry”.
He spoke out after both Hadley Freeman and Jonathan Freedland announced that they were resigning their roles as columnists, with Freedland also raising concerns about the secret owners of the newspaper.
The stories under Perry’s name sparked a probe from the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) after he falsely reported that Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar intended to smuggle Israeli hostages out of Gaza and into Iran. The report was seen as conveniently supporting baseless claims made the previous day by Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
READ MORE: UN chief 'never seen such death and destruction' as in Gaza amid Israel assault
Perry has also faced questions over a report which alleged to give the inside story of the assassination of Hamas politburo chief Ismail Haniyeh, as well as his claims to have worked as a political science professor at Tel Aviv University – which reportedly had no record of him – and to have taken part in Israel’s 1976 Entebbe raid to rescue hostages in Uganda.
As backlash to Perry’s stories grew, various Israeli media outlets reported their own intelligence sources as saying his articles were made up.
On Friday, the Jewish Chronicle said it had “concluded a thorough investigation into freelance journalist Elon Perry, which commenced after allegations were made about aspects of his record”.
The paper said it had “removed his stories from our website and ended any association with Mr Perry”, going on: “The Jewish Chronicle maintains the highest journalistic standards in a highly contested information landscape and we deeply regret the chain of events that led to this point.”
I have done the same https://t.co/s5Mmc36gJy
— David Aaronovitch (@DAaronovitch) September 15, 2024
On Sunday, journalist David Aaronovitch said he had cut ties with the paper, Freeman said that “recent events have made it impossible for me to stay”, and Freedland issued a longer statement.
Noting that his father Michael Freedland had also written for the paper, Freedland said: “That bond partly explains why I've stuck with it even as it departed from the traditions that built its reputation as the world's oldest Jewish newspaper and, in its own, somewhat quaint words, 'the organ of British Jewry’.”
“The latest scandal brings great disgrace on the paper – publishing fabricated stories and showing only the thinnest form of contrition – but it is only the latest.
“Too often, the JC reads like a partisan, ideological instrument, its judgments political rather than journalistic.”
READ MORE: BBC coverage of Gaza should be subject to ‘deep, systematic’ review, says chairman
He went on: “Of course, all newspapers make mistakes and run articles that writers on the paper dislike. The problem in this case is that there can be no real accountability because the JC is owned by a person or people who refuse to reveal themselves.”
The paper’s editor Wallis Simons is facing calls to resign.
Also on Sunday, he put out a statement claiming to have been “deceived” by Perry.
He went on: “Readers can be assured that stronger internal procedures are being implemented.
"I understand why some columnists have decided to step back from the paper. I am grateful for their contributions and hope that, in time, some of them will feel able to return.
“I take full responsibility for the mistakes that have been made and I will take equal responsibility for the task of making sure nothing like this can happen again.”
The Sunday Times's Whitehall editor Gabriel Pogrund commented: "Thank you
@Freedland and @HadleyFreeman for your eloquence and courage.
"The increasingly destructive editorship of the JC is no longer tenable. Its ownership must be revealed — and hopefully replaced too.
"The community deserves, and needs, better."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel