FORMER Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn has reportedly addressed a meeting for a new left-wing political party.
The event saw discussions about the formation of a new party called Collective and was also attended by former Unite general secretary Len McCluskey, The Guardian reports.
Collective aims to act as an incubator for future leaders who could replace Corbyn as a left-wing rallying figure as well as targeting seats at the next General Election.
At a private meeting on Sunday, Corbyn gave the opening speech and founders said they would begin drawing up democratic structures for the new party.
A source close to Corbyn told The Guardian his attendance was not an official endorsement and that he had gone to “listen to and share a variety of views about the way forward for the left”.
One organiser told the paper the new left party would contest the next General Election and would “hopefully be a meaningful counterweight to Reform and the rightwing drift of the Labour party”.
Other attendees were said to include former North of Tyne mayor Jamie Driscoll (above), Tower Hamlets mayor Lutfur Rahman, director Ken Loach, Andrew Feinstein, the anti-apartheid activist who stood against Keir Starmer at the last election and Corbyn’s former chief of staff Karie Murphy.
Feinstein and Driscoll are said to be among a number of those present who are opposed to the creation of a new political party.
Pamela Fitzpatrick, the director of Corbyn’s Peace and Justice project and set to be the new movement’s director, said “now is the time” to become an established party.
READ MORE: Independent MPs, including Jeremy Corbyn, form 'alliance' to challenge Labour
She said: “We have seen the rise of the far right and already people are feeling politically homeless because they were so desperate for change but support for Labour is dropping so quickly. We need a real movement that can fill that gap.”
A strategy briefing prepared for Sunday’s meeting suggested a mass membership drive and attempting to gain trade union affiliations.
One source told The Guardian: “Lots of people have been involved in independent campaigns in the last election that did surprisingly well, even if they didn’t win.
“This was the beginning of a potential mass movement of the working class outside of the Labour Party.”
Corbyn (above), who was booted out of Labour by Starmer, has formed an alliance with four other independent MPs who were elected on left-wing, pro-Gaza platforms in July.
One attendee said that while the success of left-wing critics of Labour presented an “opportunity”, there was also “a challenge for the left to move beyond Jeremy [Corbyn]”.
They added: “I think that there is a real concern that if we, if the left, doesn’t do this now, and if we don’t act now, then the Starmer government is just going to open the door to Farage as the next prime minister.”
READ MORE: Furious Scottish Labour members 'quitting party' over Winter Fuel Payment cut
Starmer’s government is becoming increasingly unpopular, with a poll last week showing his popularity rating had plummeted to minus 14 points.
There is scepticism among some on the left about the wisdom of creating a new political party, after the failures of previous efforts such as George Galloway’s Workers Party GB and Left Unity.
In a piece for The Guardian earlier this year, Corbyn said he intended to back a grassroots movement “capable of challenging the stale two-party system” which would “eventually run in elections”. But he also warned that to create a new, centralised party, based around the personality of one person, is to put the cart before the horse”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel