A LABOUR MP defended Keir Starmer’s wife being gifted clothes and the services of a personal shopper because the PM’s spouse “works for the NHS” and is “not a millionairess”.
Labour backbencher Paul Waugh, who worked as a political correspondent before the election, said that the Prime Minister had been “scrupulous” and transparent in declaring gifts from donor Lord Alli.
The Prime Minister has been reported to the parliamentary standards watchdog after failing to declare on time gifts including clothes, a personal shopper and alterations for Victoria Starmer (below).
Speaking on the BBC’s Politics Live, Waugh was asked why the Prime Minister and his wife could not “buy their own clothes”.
The Rochdale MP responded: “Well it’s worth saying that Keir Starmer’s wife works for the NHS, she’s not a millionairess, she’s not someone of grand origins and she needed a bit of extra help in this very unusual role of being the PM’s spouse.
Labour MP Paul Waugh explains that its ok for politicians to take bribes so long as they're declared #politicslive pic.twitter.com/6F1IF4v71m
— Saul Staniforth (@SaulStaniforth) September 16, 2024
“But the key thing here is the one about transparency. There’s no smoking gun of an abuse of public office here or in terms of donations, too. What’s happened is the Prime Minister was being extra scrupulous in going back and looking at the records, what did we need to declare and had we declared everything we needed to.”
READ MORE: Keir Starmer insists 'rules followed' in row over clothes donation
Waugh later clarified that “everyone can afford to buy their own clothes” after being challenged on the gifts being declared late.
He added: “I’m not a former fashion correspondent, I’m a former political correspondent, so don’t get me on the details of dresses.
“She obviously felt she needed some extra help and it’s not as if this is like the Tories accepting five million quid from Frank Hester who said some racist and dangerous things about Diane Abbott or like Rishi Sunak spending £40m of taxpayers’ money on a vanity helicopter just to avoid the general public, so we’re not in the same league here as all those other things that happened in the past.”
Waugh also said Starmer had declared the gifts eventually and argued it was “not as if a newspaper suddenly exposed this as being a new dress that hadn’t been declared”.
He added: “It was the PM himself that did it and the only expose was the fact that he declared it.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel