ANAS Sarwar has said he is “not interested” in membership numbers after it was reported Scottish Labour were losing supporters over the decision to cut the Winter Fuel Payment.
Party insiders told the Daily Record that members have quit in anger over the decision they feared could unfairly impact pensioners.
Starmer previously said the “challenging” decision was needed to plug a £22 billion black hole left by the Tories while MP Michael Shanks admitted his constituents were unhappy with the decision.
Following the announcement, the Scottish Government also said it had been left with “no choice” but to end universal fuel payments in Scotland.
An insider told the paper members feel “let down” and speculated many more loyal supporters would leave if there wasn’t a “rethink” on the cut.
READ MORE: Anas Sarwar defends Keir Starmer for migration talks with Italy
Sarwar spoke to the media at the Emirates Arena on Monday after holding a summit with business leaders on the prospect of Glasgow hosting the 2026 Commonwealth Games.
Asked about whether he was concerned about his chances of being First Minister amid reports of his party losing members, he said: “Our membership has actually increased since the election but I’m interested in not membership numbers, because parties can all argue about membership numbers.
“It’s well known that a different party other than mine has probably the largest membership number of any political party in the country, but what matters is the number of votes you get not the number of members you have.
“We got the most votes in the election a couple of months ago and that gives us opportunity to deliver change right across the UK and I want us to get the most votes in 2026 so we can deliver change in Scotland.”
On Sunday, UK Government energy minister Shanks – who represents Rutherglen at Westminster – told the BBC there was “no doubt” people who elected him were angry at how Labour had acted.
However, Shanks insisted that Labour had not made a “mistake” in deciding to cut the Winter Fuel Payment, and warned that they would be making further cuts moving forward.
READ MORE: Poll: When will another Scottish independence referendum happen?
Before the General Election, all pensioners could expect to receive a payment of between £100 and £300 to help cover fuel bills through the winter. However, soon after coming to power Labour cut the payment back, making it means-tested in a move which charities have warned risks pushing people into poverty.
At Westminster last week, 35 of Scotland’s 37 Labour MPs voted to support the cut, while two abstained.
One Scottish Labour insider told the Record: “Members are angry and feel let down. Rushing to remove the winter heating payment from pensioners who need it is a terrible mistake.
“Without a rethink we could see many more loyal members quitting this winter.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel