PLANS for the controversial Flamingo Land Lomond Banks development have been rejected.
The Loch Lomond and Trossachs National Park Authority met on Monday to decide on the plans, which included two hotels and more than 100 self-catering lodges as well as a waterpark and other amenities on the southernmost point of Loch Lomond.
A similar project was rejected by the authority in 2019 but was re-submitted by Yorkshire-based theme park operator Flamingo Land in 2022.
READ MORE: Plans revealed for huge multi-million pound development in Scottish city
The meeting heard that only 69 people had written in support of the proposed park since the plans first came under examination in May 2022.
Overall, 174,946 objections were received – the majority through a campaign led by the Scottish Green Party, with 834 made to the park authority.
Before the meeting at Lomond Parish Church started, protest group Save Loch Lomond gathered outside to voice their opposition. The meeting was also tense, with those speaking for the plans heckled at regular intervals.
The proposals were rejected unanimously by the national park's board.
Dr Heather Reid, the board's convener, said the plans had ultimately been refused because they did not deliver significant biodiversity enhancement, were in an area prone to flood risk and would result in a larger loss of woodland area - including ancient woodland - than was originally set out in the application.
READ MORE: 'Fantasy talk': Ministers criticised for Grangemouth media appearances
The board also concluded that the scale of the proposal overall was "in conflict with the site's capacity for development".
Reid said: "The role and purpose of national parks is changing. It is recognised that national parks can provide leadership for nature recovery and significantly contribute to becoming a net zero nation.
“As such, our National Park Partnership Plan states that future development and infrastructure within the National Park should support tackling the climate emergency and maximise opportunities to deliver or enable nature restoration.
“Ultimately the board felt that this proposed development would not do that.
“The application was refused because it does not comply with Scotland’s National Planning Framework 4, the Local Development Plan for the National Park or the National Park Partnership Plan.”
'Huge victory for campaign to save Loch Lomond'
The Scottish Greens have led a campaign against the development, including calling for the exclusive deal between Flamingo Land and Scottish Enterprise to develop the site to be scrapped if the plans are rejected.
Greens MSP Ross Greer, a vocal critic throughout the campaign, also spoke out against the proposal during the meeting, and particularly the "scale" of the plans.
READ MORE: Major Scottish festival returns after cancellation due to boycott
"Their own impact assessment states that less than half of the jobs on this site would be full-time," he said.
"On transport, the developers' own assessment predicts more than 250 cars per hour at peak time. We can all understand the impact that would have for local residents and visitors."
Following the announcement, Greer (above) said: “This is a huge victory for my Balloch constituents and for our long-running campaign to save Loch Lomond.
“Residents have been united against this daft plan from the start, stepping up to defend one of Scotland's iconic landscapes. After almost a decade, this is the result the community and campaigners deserve.
READ MORE: Archaeologists discover rare early medieval workshop on Scottish island
“Every one of the 155,000 people who objected to this application played an important role in securing today’s rejection and I am grateful to them all."
He called on Flamingo Land to "drop their plans for good" and commit not to lodge a third attempt for planning permission.
“After this defeat, I’m calling on Flamingo Land to drop their plans for good and end this decade-long saga. After years of stress and anxiety for local residents, they must commit to no third attempt.
"Loch Lomond does not need a mega-resort and whatever tweaks they make to these daft plans, they will never go ahead," he added.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel