THE UK and Scottish governments have been criticised by a major trade union after ministerial media appearances focusing on Grangemouth over the weekend.
Unite, one of Scotland’s biggest trade unions with around 150,000 members, expressed anger after UK Energy Minister Michael Shanks, and his Scottish Government counterpart Gillian Martin, said they were “confident” the workforce would find new jobs following the closure of the site.
Sharon Graham, the trade union’s general secretary, accused the two government figures of “fantasy talk”.
READ MORE: Scotland to Europe ferry: Grangemouth site 'could make project work'
Grangemouth oil refinery will close by next summer, with four-fifths of workers, approximately 475 people, expected to lose their jobs. The site is set to be transformed into a scaled-down facility for importing and distributing “finished fuels”.
Grangemouth’s total economic contribution stands at £403.6 million, with 2822 direct, indirect and induced jobs reliant on its operations, according to Scottish Enterprise.
The organisation said that while Labour saw major gains in Scotland at the July General Election, they had “utterly failed to deliver” for staff at the plant.
“Scotland backed Labour at the ballot box but so far Labour has utterly failed to deliver for the Grangemouth workers when it needed them most,” said Graham.
She went on: “Over the last few days, our members have witnessed government ministers condescendingly speaking about ready-made jobs being available. It is fantasy talk from people who have no clue about the realities on the ground. We need urgent action to support the workers of today not just warm words from ministers about the projects of the future.”
READ MORE: SNP Energy Secretary contradicts BBC report on Grangemouth buyer
The trade union’s Scottish secretary Derek Thomson added that members are “furious” and feel “utterly betrayed” by both Westminster and Holyrood.
“Ministers are deliberately downplaying and deflecting from the industrial wreckage which they have allowed to happen,” he said. “They have collectively failed the workforce.”
“Hundreds of millions of pounds are in danger of being sucked out of the economy and hundreds of jobs dependent on the refinery are now at immediate risk”.
In recent days, SNP MSP Michelle Thomson has spoken of a potential buyer for the site. This was contradicted by Martin, who said she was "wary" of this talk.
Thomson says a non-disclosure agreement is preventing her from divulging details about a possible buy-out.
When the decision to close the site was announced on Thursday, both the UK and Scottish governments announced a £100 million investment package in the hopes of improving prospects in the Grangemouth area.
Around £20m will be split evenly by the Scottish and UK governments to be invested in existing industrial sites in the area, with firms being incentivised to take on Grangemouth workers facing redundancy.
The remaining £80m will be used to encourage new businesses to set up shop in the region and take on Grangemouth workers.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel