STEPHEN Flynn has been left fuming with the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards following reports Keir Starmer won’t be investigated for his late declaration of clothes gifted to his wife.
The Prime Minister has signalled he would carry on taking gifts from Labour peer Lord Alli amid a backlash over the gifts.
He insisted there was a “massive difference between declarations and corruption” as he faced questions over his alleged failure to register high-end clothing given to Lady Starmer by the prominent donor on time.
READ MORE: John Swinney to face first committee grilling as First Minister
The Tories have demanded a full investigation into the Starmers’ links with Lord Alli with the party calling for an investigation into Starmer’s “failure to declare”.
However, it was reported by the Daily Mail’s deputy political editor Harriet Line that Starmer won’t be investigated by the commissioner.
Reacting to the news on Twitter/X, Flynn said: “Yet last year the commissioner deemed it reasonable to launch an investigation into my use of 28 pence worth of stationery.
“The process lasted four months. It concluded with no action, of course.”
The SNP Westminster leader was referencing how he was reported to House of Commons authorities in July after a PR stunt which saw his team hand out mugs stuffed with official parliament compliments slips criticising the Labour Party.
Number 10 has said it sought advice from the authorities on the issue of declarations and believed its conduct had been compliant but that “following further interrogation this month, we have declared further items”.
MPs are required to register gifts and donations within 28 days.
Speaking to journalists travelling with him on his visit to Rome, Starmer dismissed the idea that taxpayers should fund such expenses for prime ministers and their spouses, but suggested it would be “pushing it a bit far” to deny him the right to accept certain kinds of hospitality.
Giving the example of football tickets, which the Prime Minister is known to accept as gifts, he said: “I’m a massive Arsenal fan. I can’t go into the stands because of security reasons. Therefore, if I don’t accept a gift of hospitality, I can’t go to a game. You could say, ‘well, bad luck’. That’s why gifts have to be registered.
“But, you know, never going to an Arsenal game again because I can’t accept hospitality is pushing it a bit far.”
The National has approached the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards for further comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel