THE former chief of the Yes campaign has said that Scottish Labour “essentially threatened" members considering voting for independence.
In an interview with the Daily Record, Blair Jenkins looked back on the 2014 independence referendum 10 years on from the vote.
“I knew from the start a large part of the success of the Yes campaign was going to be how many regular Labour voters we could get to vote for us,” he told the newspaper.
READ MORE: Stephen Flynn fumes as Keir Starmer 'won't face investigation' over clothes gifts
“If Labour had taken a very different attitude to the referendum campaign – and I don’t mean not take sides – but if they hadn’t insisted that everybody toe the line, and essentially threatened people who were either inclined to come out for Yes, or they knew were thinking of coming out for Yes, then I think that might have produced a different outcome.”
Jenkins (below) explained he wanted Labour to adopt a similar position to the 1979 vote on devolution – which saw members publicly supporting different sides in the run-up to the referendum.
He said: “I’m aware of Labour people who I know voted Yes and I know were in favour of independence, who never said so.
“I think it would have been possible for the party to campaign against independence as an official position, while if you supported independence then you could say so – which is what they did in the 1979 referendum.
“I’m not saying it would have necessarily changed the outcome. But had they taken the same policy in 2014 as they did in 1979, there is no doubt more Labour people would have declared for independence, and that might have persuaded more Labour voters.”
Jenkins’s interview comes a day after a new poll found 57% of Scots think the country should have a second referendum.
The former Yes campaign chief also told The National that it was “wishful thinking” to believe the 2014 result “has killed off the independence issue”.
The National has approached Scottish Labour for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel