LABOUR MP Diane Abbott has said Keir Starmer treated her like a “non-person” during a row over racist comments made about her.
Comments made by Tory donor Frank Hester emerged in March, with Abbott saying she expected “more support” from her party.
The Guardian first reported that Hester said in 2019: “It’s like trying not to be racist but you see Diane Abbott on the TV, and you’re just like I hate, you just want to hate all black women because she’s there, and I don’t hate all black women at all, but I think she should be shot.”
'They were determined to get rid of me'
— ITV News Politics (@ITVNewsPolitics) September 17, 2024
Diane Abbott tells ITV News about her candidacy battle with Labour after she was suspended by @Keir_Starmer https://t.co/0kCkwaTycR pic.twitter.com/i9jHQk8TDF
Hester has since apologised for his remarks, which Abbott said left her feeling in danger particularly given the deaths of MPs Jo Cox in 2016 and Sir David Amess in 2021.
Abbott said Labour “never reached out to me personally and did treat me as a non-person”.
“If somebody was threatening to have you shot, you would have felt your party would have offered you more support, giving you advice on safety and security, even kind of commiserated with you. And none of that happened,” she said.
READ MORE: Stephen Flynn fumes as Keir Starmer 'won't face investigation' over clothes gifts
A spokesperson for Labour said the Prime Minister has “great respect” for Abbott and that it was “simply wrong to say there was any plan being pushed by the leadership to force her out”.
Suspension comments
Abbott, who is the first black woman to become an MP, told BBC Newsnight, also said that her suspension from the party over alleged antisemitic comments was a “move against me” as Starmer hoped to “finish his clear out of the Labour left”.
The MP withdrew remarks she made in a letter to the Observer in which she suggested Jewish, Irish and Traveller people were not subject to racism “all their lives”.
In May, Newsnight revealed the investigation had been completed in December but Abbott was not told whether she would be allowed to stand for Labour in the General Election.
READ MORE: Keir Starmer's meeting with Giorgia Meloni labelled 'deeply disturbing'
She said she felt “very low” and “depressed” during the inquiry because she felt the party was trying to “get rid of me altogether as an MP”.
Abbott continued: "I think that Keir Starmer wanted to finish his clear-out of the left in the parliamentary Labour Party and by writing a very ill-advised letter, I gave him the opportunity to move against me.
"And I think what they were trying to do was to string out and string out the investigation. So when a general election is around the corner, they could just move me out of the way as a Labour candidate because I wouldn't be in the parliamentary Labour Party, and they would parachute in somewhere else".
In May, following days of intense speculation, Starmer (above) said Abbott would be standing in her seat in Hackney North and Stoke Newington.
However, she said she was offered a deal through a “third party,” which would have seen her stand down ahead of the election.
"I think the idea was that they would restore the whip in the morning. And then I would stand down in the afternoon; not the next day, not the next week, but in the afternoon. And I felt that was designed to humiliate me," the MP explained.
The Labour spokesperson said Abbott “continues to be an inspiration to many” and that the party values her “significant contribution to public life”.
They said: “There is no doubt she has received the most abuse of any MP just because of her gender and the colour of her skin, and that is completely reprehensible and wrong.
“The party, including Keir Starmer, vocally condemned Frank Hester’s vile comments and reached out to Diane at the time to offer support.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel