SCOTS believe that becoming independent and joining the EU would be better for the country than remaining in the UK, a major new study has found.
Attitudes towards Brexit have become deeply entwined with opinions about Scotland’s place in the Union, according to analysis by the Scottish Centre for Social Research and polling experts at What Scotland Thinks.
In a development which piles pressure on those arguing to remain part of the Union, researchers found that Brexit has had an “adverse impact on support for remaining in the UK”.
They found that Scots believed remaining in the UK and outside of the EU would be worse for the country than becoming independent and joining the trading bloc.
The study showed just 18% of Scots thought that staying in the UK was good for trade, compared with 53% who thought an independent Scotland within the EU would be better.
And just 25% of people believed that remaining in the Union would be better for the economy compared with 46% who said the country would be better off out of the UK and in the EU.
Researchers also found that support for independence has “risen significantly” since both indyref and the 2016 Brexit vote.
They said that between 1999 and 2014, support for independence fluctuated between 23% and 35%. Since 2019, it has “consistently” sat at around 50%, the study found.
And people’s attitudes towards EU membership are now “deeply intertwined”, according to the study which analysed data from the Scottish Social Attitudes survey and a panel by the Scottish Centre for Social Research.
In 2014, people who were pro-EU were “no more or less likely” to back independence than Eurosceptics.
READ MORE: How would Glaswegians vote on Scottish independence 10 years on? We asked them
Now, those who would vote to be part of the EU are around three times more likely to support independence than those who voted for Brexit.
Professor John Curtice (below), senior research fellow at the Scottish Centre for Social Research, said: “Today’s analysis provides a unique record of how attitudes towards Scotland’s constitutional status have evolved over the past 25 years. And it is clear that the UK’s decision to leave the EU has had a significant impact on public attitudes towards independence.
“However, in practice, there has been little debate about Scotland’s constitutional status since the implementation of Brexit. We cannot be sure what view Scots would take about independence when they have heard more about the issues at stake.”
He added that it was “now clear” that the debate around EU membership versus membership of the UK would be “potentially crucial” in the event of a second referendum.
It comes after research published earlier this week found that Yes would easily win in a new referendum if it was certain Scotland would join the EU.
A YouGov survey, published on Tuesday, found that 56% of people would vote for independence if it meant EU membership, while just 32% would vote No.
But the same research also showed that support on both sides was practically unaltered since 2014, with No on 56% versus Yes on 44% in response to the question: "Scotland Scotland be an independent country?"
Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie said: “Scotland has suffered through a brutal Tory Brexit, which we didn't vote for, but have had to endure. It has meant increased prices, an increasingly toxic politics and curbs on our rights to live, travel and study across Europe.”
READ MORE: Yes would win new independence vote if Scotland were to join EU, poll finds
He said that Scottish independence was the “only way” the country could joining the EU to “extend a hand of friendship to the world”.
Harvie added: “With independence, we could do so much more to tackle the climate crisis and build a future we can be proud of.
“It is down to progressive pro-independence parties to show that alternative. That means a relentless focus on making people’s lives better and protecting our planet.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel