IT would be foolish to assume Scottish independence is “over and done with”, despite there not being another clear path to a referendum, a pollster and analyst has said.
Speaking ahead of the 10-year anniversary of the vote on September 18, Mark Diffley said that as things stand it is “unlikely” the SNP would be able to form a government after the next Holyrood election in 2026.
Wednesday will mark a decade since Scots went to the polls to decide the country’s constitutional future.
On a record turnout, voters were asked to decide on the proposition, “Should Scotland be an independent country?’ – with No taking 55% of the vote and Yes 45%.
Diffley told the PA news agency the debates around the independence referendum have shaped almost all of Scottish politics since then.
READ MORE: Alan Cumming tears into The Vow on 2014 referendum anniversary
The former director of Ipsos Mori in Scotland said the assumption in Scottish Labour at the time had been that the No vote in 2014 would “bring everything back to normal” and put an end to the SNP’s surge.
Instead, the SNP won over the coalition of Yes voters as well as some No voters to take all but three of Scotland’s seats in the 2015 general election.
Diffley said: “What happened was (the referendum) went on to dominate how we voted in pretty much every form of election, I would argue, until this year.”
Since SNP’s landslide general election win in 2015, the party has lost more than a third of its vote and fell to nine seats at the last general election.
Two events in the decade following the referendum pushed support for independence to just beyond 50%, he said, these being the Brexit vote and Nicola Sturgeon’s response to the Covid pandemic.
However, economic and public service concerns seem to have displaced independence as the main concern for many voters, he said, adding: “Satisfaction with the NHS has gone down.
“Satisfaction with the school system has gone down.
“Over time, these issues have replaced the constitutional question as the real barometer around which people will decide how to vote.”
As voters’ understanding of devolution has increased, he said the incumbent Scottish Government is now more likely to “carry the can” for any perceived policy failures.
Diffley added: “The fact that we’ve still got 45% and upwards supporting independence suggests this is not an issue that’s dealt with in the long term.
READ MORE: Scottish independence would be won on one condition, poll finds
“There currently is no vehicle for achieving a second referendum either legally or politically, because the SNP is weak.
“It’s likely, I would say – at this stage – to be voted out of government.
“You’ve got a UK Government that has no interest in re-litigating this issue.
“But still nearly half the population would vote for it.”
If the SNP is able to “mend itself” it is perfectly feasible that independence could be back on the table, he said.
He added: “The sense of flux in the political world is greater than I’ve ever seen it.
“You be a fool to think that’s a done deal – anything with that level of support is something that should have red lights flashing for unionist parties.
“So absolutely not over and done with.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel