RESULTS of the Scottish independence referendum started flowing in 10 years ago on Thursday, with Clackmannanshire being the first council to declare on the morning of September 19.
A decade on, let's take a look at how Scotland voted – and why.
Scotland's Yes belt
Four out of Scotland's 32 local authorities registered majority votes for Yes – but these councils have more than 20% of the country's population.
Three of the four – Glasgow City, West Dunbartonshire and North Lanarkshire – were in Strathclyde, while the fourth was Dundee City Council.
Dundee was Scotland's biggest Yes council, with 57.3% support, followed up by West Dunbartonshire at 54%.
Up next was Glasgow, at 53.5%, then North Lanarkshire at 51.1%.
READ MORE: How would Glaswegians vote on Scottish independence 10 years on? We asked them
The six most socially deprived councils in Scotland – including those four, and adding Inverclyde and North Ayrshire – all had the highest proportion of Yes votes.
Inverclyde had a 49.9% support for Yes, while North Ayrshire had 48.9%.
The odd coalition
Meanwhile, the councils with the highest No votes were an odd coalition, joining the island councils with both rural and urban local authorities.
Orkney recorded the highest percentage of No votes, with Shetland coming closely behind in 4th place.
The Scottish Borders had the highest rate of No votes on the mainland at a round 66.6%, while Dumfries and Galloway came next at 67.5%.
READ MORE: Indyref: How the polls changed before the referendum
The relatively urban East Renfrewshire came next, with 63.2% support for No, followed up by the decidedly less so East Lothian at 61.7%.
The council most representative of the Scotland-wide total was West Lothian, with 44.8% support for Yes and 55.2% for No – just 0.1% off the national result for each.
What demographics tells us
Academic analysis of the results came within weeks of the referendum, producing studies and polls that explored which groups of Scots voted which way.
The Scottish Referendum Study, published in 2014 and backed by the universities of Glasgow and Edinburgh, found that No voters came from a range of backgrounds.
It found that Protestants, the very young and very old, people on average incomes and women were more likely to vote No.
Meanwhile, young and middle age people, people on lower incomes and men were more likely to vote Yes.
READ MORE: Glasgow to host Commonwealth Games in 2026
In a blog post in late September 2014, polling expert John Curtice made his own deep dive into the results.
Based on polling conducted during and after the referendum, he found that the age group with the highest Yes support was people in their late 20s and early 30s.
He also found that people in working class occupations were significantly more likely to vote Yes than those in middle class occupations.
The highest indication of Yes support he found was employment status – for areas with relatively high unemployment, the Yes vote was 51%, while in those with lower rates it was 39%.
Finally, he found that the councils which had the highest No votes were in the top seven in terms of number of people born in the UK, and the top six in terms of number of people describing themselves as "British" in the 2011 census.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel