FORMER first minister Humza Yousaf has proposed an international solution to break the “impasse” between Holyrood and Westminster on the constitutional issue.
Yousaf suggested bringing in a foreign “third party” to help mediate the competing ideologies of Scotland’s governments in Edinburgh and Westminster.
In a Twitter/X thread reflecting on the 10th anniversary of the independence referendum, the SNP MSP said: “The UK Government clearly fears the verdict of the people of Scotland in another referendum.
“The impasse has to be broken, and both UK and Scottish governments should consider whether an international third party should be sought to negotiate a way forward between both governments.”
The former first minister, who was replaced by John Swinney (below) earlier this year, also reflected that the Yes movement must “be honest about where we've fallen short”.
He added: “We have, rightly, pointed out failures of the union, but we have not done enough to persuade people about the benefits of independence.
“That requires honesty about where there are challenges, but being confident about the incredible opportunities independence would bring.
“That goes two-ways and those who oppose independence must also be honest about the numerous promises made in 2014 that have, since, been broken.”
READ MORE: Scots believe leaving UK and joining EU is better for country, study shows
Yousaf said that he had “no doubt” Scotland would become an independent country in his lifetime.
During his time as first minister and SNP leader, Yousaf (below) steered through an independence strategy which would see the party winning the majority of Scottish seats at a General Election, at least 29, as a mandate for a second referendum.
The strategy also put forward an alternative to use the 2026 Scottish Parliament election as a de facto referendum on independence.
The SNP were reduced to just nine seats in the House of Commons after the July poll.
His premiership was brought down after he fired Scottish Green ministers from government, triggering a crisis and ending the Bute House Agreement which had provided a pro-independence majority for the Scottish Government.
Since then, the SNP under John Swinney have governed as a minority government.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel