MSPs have voted to back a motion in support of Scottish independence.
The Holyrood debate and vote came on the occasion of the 10th anniversary of the 2014 independence referendum.
Tabled by John Swinney, the motion said “it is only with all the powers of a normal independent nation that Scotland would truly be enabled to take its own decisions to fully meet the needs of the people of Scotland” – with MSPs voting by 68 to 56 to back it.
A Green amendment which called for the creation of a constitutional convention was also passed.
Meanwhile, Tory, Labour, Liberal Democrat and Alba amendments to the motion fell.
READ MORE: Scottish Labour support plummets in major new poll
In a set-piece speech on Wednesday morning, the First Minister said Scotland is now closer to independence than it was 10 years ago, later saying in the Holyrood debate that the “people of Scotland should have the opportunity to take that decision again”.
“The people of Scotland were able to take their decision (in 2014), and my firm view in opening this debate today is that the people of Scotland should have the opportunity to take that decision again,” he said.
“This parliament has confirmed its belief that it should be open to any nation of the United Kingdom to choose to withdraw from the union by democratic means – that is my view and I believe the view of this parliament should be respected.”
He added the “challenge” for independence supporters is now to convince more Scots that their priorities could be better addressed outside of the UK.
Swinney said: “I think we are closer to achieving that than we were in 2014.”
Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar (above), meanwhile, highlighted what he branded “failure” by the Scottish Government in areas such as housing, the NHS, drug and alcohol deaths, and education as he demanded: “What has this SNP Government been doing for the last 10 years since 2014?
“The truth is the reason why we have made so little progress over the last 10 years is because this SNP Government has been leading a campaign, not a Government.
“They have been trying to hide their failures behind the smokescreen of the constitution.”
Continuing his attack, he insisted the SNP is “the party of the past” and of “failure, decline and incompetence”.
But Scottish Green MSP Ross Greer said the last decade had “only deepened” his party’s support for independence.
He highlighted how there had been “10 years of Tory government, Brexit, Boris Johnson, Liz Truss and now a Labour government but no change from those Tory policies”.
Greer added: “Greens believe in independence for a simple reason – we think the best decision-makers for Scotland are the people who live here.
“The Scottish Greens believe that this isn’t as good as it gets for Scotland.
“We can be a fairer, greener nation with the powers of a normal independent country.”
Alba MSP Ash Regan argued that with pro-independence parties having a majority in Holyrood, they can still push the issue forward.
She stressed she wants to maintain the “spirit of the referendum” in which supporters of different parties “put our differences aside for independence”.
Regan said: “There are three pro-independence parties in this chamber. If we start working on it today, we still have the time, we have the arithmetic, to turn this ship around and achieve independence.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel