KEIR Starmer’s Labour Party have come under fire after accepting a multi-million-pound donation from an offshore hedge fund with investments in weapons firms and private healthcare.
OpenDemocracy reported that the Cayman Islands-registered Quadrature Capital had made the sixth largest political donation in British history to Starmer’s party just after the General Election was announced.
The website said that the timing was “notable” as the £4 million donation was made before the “pre-poll reporting period” which sees all donations over £11,180 published weekly, rather than quarterly.
The tax haven-registered firm claimed in a statement on its website that the donation was not “political”.
READ MORE: Scots deliver damning verdict on Labour Government in major new poll
“Having analysed commitments set out by each party, we donated £4m to The Labour Party, in support of policies that will deliver climate action while also promoting social equity and economic resilience,” it said.
“This was a values-based donation, not a political donation, as Quadrature Capital Ltd remains non-partisan and apolitical.
“Going forward, our private giving will continue to be led by our values, and any further donations to political parties will depend on the parties’ commitments, track record and alignment with our mission for sustainable and equitable growth.”
The SNP have hit out at Labour, with the party writing on social media: “Labour accepted a donation from a Cayman Islands-registered hedge fund with shares worth hundreds of millions of pounds in fossil fuels, private health firms, and arms manufacturers.
“At the same time, Labour are cutting vital support for the most vulnerable. Whose side are Labour on? Working people or their hedge-fund bankrollers?”
🚨 Labour accepted a donation from a Cayman Islands-registered hedge fund with shares worth hundreds of millions of pounds in fossil fuels, private health firms, and arms manufacturers.
— The SNP (@theSNP) September 19, 2024
👉 At the same time, Labour are cutting vital support for the most vulnerable.
📢 Whose side… pic.twitter.com/CgMVjpr4Lq
In a comment shared by Transport Secretary Fiona Hyslop, SNP councillor Pauline Stafford added: “Now we know how Labour could afford to bombard Scotland with all those false 'change' ads in the run up to the election.”
The news comes amid concerns about Starmer’s propensity to accept gifts from wealthy donors, for both himself and his wife.
ITV reported on Wednesday that the Prime Minister had been given the use of a corporate box by Arsenal football club, which is advertised as costing “from £8750” per game.
READ MORE: Keir Starmer making it 'difficult' to argue for Union, Better Together adviser says
The Guardian calculated that Starmer has already accepted more than £100,000 worth of gifts in tickets to games or concerts and clothes.
That paper said the Prime Minister had accepted “more free tickets and gifts than other major party leaders in recent times”.
Foreign Secretary David Lammy has insisted that it is right for Starmer to accept gifts of clothes because he needs to look his best for the UK.
And Starmer has argued that preventing him from getting free things – such as tickets to watch Arsenal – would be “pushing it a bit far”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel