THE Scottish Greens have called on the First Minister to end the exclusivity agreement between a government agency and Flamingo Land’s proposed Loch Lomond development.
This week, the Loch Lomond and Trossachs National Park Authority rejected plans for a controversial development on the banks of the loch – which included two hotels and more than 100 self-catering lodges as well as a waterpark and other amenities.
However, under the terms of an agreement with Scottish Enterprise, the firm currently has exclusive rights to develop the site.
READ MORE: Greens: Flamingo Land deal on Loch Lomond must end if plans rejected
Now, Ross Greer – a vocal critic and campaigner against the plans – has called for this deal to be scrapped.
Speaking at First Minister’s Questions, the Scottish Greens MSP told John Swinney that this would allow for more positive alternative proposals to come forward.
“I am delighted by the park board’s unanimous rejection after a decade of attempts by Flamingo Land to force this daft mega-resort on Balloch,” Greer said.
“Over 154,000 people joined our campaign and objected. They were joined by the Woodland Trust, Ramblers, the National Trust for Scotland, and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency.
“I’ve written to the First Minister to request that the Scottish Government terminate Flamingo Land’s exclusive contract with the government agency who own most of the site.
“This agreement was renewed after their first failed application in 2019, and it’s the key reason this threat has hung over the people of Balloch for a decade. It has prevented more appropriate development proposals from coming forward.
“So, can I ask the First Minister, will the Scottish Government end rather than renew this agreement? And will they review the use of exclusivity agreements and the impact they have on communities like Balloch?”
The First Minister responded that there will be "mixed opinions" over exclusivity agreements but that they serve a purpose including accelerating planning developments in areas like renewable energy.
"I'd simply say that we have to have a broad view of these questions," Swinney added.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here