THE SNP should consider a coalition with Labour after the next Holyrood election, according to an ex-MP.
Stewart McDonald, the former Glasgow South MP until the 2024 General Election, said that a partnership between Scotland’s two “centre-left parties” wouldn't be easy but could happen after a “messy” result in 2026.
Writing in The Spectator on Wednesday – on the occasion of the 10th anniversary of the Scottish independence referendum – McDonald said: “Over the 25 years of devolution, we’ve seen many different manifestations of government: minority administrations, a majority administration and formal coalitions.”
He added: “Yet we’ve never seen the most obvious. A coalition between the SNP and Labour, Scotland’s two dominant centre left-parties — similar to the Irish model that saw Fine Gael and Fianna Fail rotate the office of taoiseach — is one we might want to consider in the event of a messy result in 2026.”
READ MORE: John Swinney and Anas Sarwar clash over Labour's ‘no austerity’ claim
McDonald said it would be a “breath of fresh air”.
“I don’t suggest for a moment of course that this would be easy. It would take compromise and continuous effort to make it work. But it would, overnight, transform a political culture that has grown more interested in having an argument than winning an argument,” he wrote.
It comes off the heels of several polls, including a Survation survey commissioned by Angus Robertson’s firm Progress Scotland, which found that support for Scottish Labour has plummeted since the General Election in July.
On the issue of independence, McDonald went on: "Whilst all parties have a job to do in tidying up our political dialogue over the coming time, the case and campaign for independence must be reimagined totally if it is to succeed in the future.
"This is not to be underestimated. It will require those false prophets who advance clever wheezes and shortcuts to be given no quarter.
"Those who labour under the falsehood that we can just declare independence on the back of an election, or that the international community can be invited to solve what is a peaceful domestic debate, are not serious."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel