THE teenager who heckled the Prime Minister in his Labour conference speech has spoken out on why he chose to take a stand.
Daniel Riley, 18, said he was moved to shout due to Keir Starmer’s stance on the Middle East, particularly the fact that the Labour Government continues to allow arms to be exported to Israel.
The Prime Minister was talking about how every child’s contribution should be heard when Riley started to shout about Israel's bombardment of Gaza.
He shouted: “What about the children of Gaza?"
“Those opportunities don't go to every child do they?"
READ MORE: Labour conference: GB Energy to be headquartered in Aberdeen
After the disruption, Starmer responded: “This guy’s obviously got a pass from the 2019 conference.”
He added: “While he’s been protesting, we’ve been changing the party. That’s why we’ve got a Labour government.”
After being released by security, Riley told journalists: “The hypocrisy when every day we’re still sending British bombs and British bullets that are being used in Lebanon and in Gaza right now and the Prime Minister – he could stop that, he could stop that right now but he doesn’t.
“And he says that he wants things to stop but he won’t lift a finger to actually stop it.”
Asked if he had planned to disrupt the leader’s speech, Riley said: “No, I was a delegate, I’m a Labour Party member, I hoped I’d be one for life but I suspect not now.”
He added: "What happened is a complete failure of the Labour Party and for Keir Starmer to address it is sickening."
Starmer had called for a ceasefire in his speech which prompted Riley to speak out as he was "angry" over the Prime Minister "not lifting a finger" to try and stop the genocide.
When asked by journalists what Riley wants from the Labour Party he said: "A complete suspension of arms sales to Israel, embargoes, sanctions, whatever it takes to stop this genocide that is currently occurring not just empty gratitudes."
He then added that he was "absolutely not" happy with Starmer as leader of the Labour Party over his inaction to reprimand Israel over the war in Gaza.
The move comes after Rachel Reeves's speech was disrupted by a protester on Monday.
Shortly after Reeves began her speech, a pair unfurled a banner reading “Still backing polluters, still arming Israel – we voted for change” and shouted slogans before they were escorted from the hall by security.
In response, Reeves said: “This is a changed Labour Party, a Labour Party that represents working people, not a party of protest.”
Tenants’ anger at living conditions after buyout of Scottish island
READ MORE:A spokesperson for Climate Resistance, which organised the protest, said: “Labour promised us change – instead we’re getting more of the same. The same pandering to the fossil fuel industry; the same arms licences that are fuelling a genocide in Gaza, and the same austerity that sees the poorest hit hardest.
“It’s time for Labour to start putting the needs of people before the interests of profit. That means immediately stopping arms licences to Israel, blocking new oil and gas, and standing up for the communities already being devastated by the climate crisis.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel