ANDREW Marr has hit out at “offensive” and “ridiculous” Gaelic signs in parts of Scotland.
The veteran broadcaster was speaking at an “In Conversation” event with Anas Sarwar at Labour conference.
An audience member at the Q&A event organised by Scottish Fabians asked the Scottish Labour leader about promoting the Welsh language, which then prompted Sarwar to mention Gaelic.
"Perhaps I disagree totally with Anas here, I don’t know,” Marr interrupted.
"I find it equally offensive that all sorts of parts of Scotland, which have never been Gaelic, have never had Scots spoken [have Gaelic signs].”
READ MORE: Gaelic language in Scotland is in ‘perilous state’, MSPs warn
Marr – who previously worked for the BBC as a political editor – then asked: "Why does Haymarket [station] have to have the Gaelic for Haymarket under it? It’s ridiculous.
"The Scots are made up of many different peoples historically. Many different groups of people have come to Scotland and they brought different languages and I think we should let languages rest and prosper where they come from.”
Sarwar (below) soon cut him off to ask if Torcuil Crichton – who speaks Gaelic and is the Labour MP for the Western Isles – was in the room.
"I sincerely hope not," said Marr. Sarwar then responded that he did not "take the Andrew Marr view".
It comes as plans to boost the Scots and Gaelic languages in areas of Scotland where they are traditionally used was passed at the first phase in Holyrood last week.
MSPs voted in favour of the general outlines of the Scottish Languages Bill, which, if passed, will allow parents to apply for Gaelic early learning and childcare.
The bill, which has now passed stage one, will also help ensure that Gaelic medium primary pupils can continue their education in secondary school.
It is hoped this will encourage the increase of the language’s provision within Scotland’s school curriculum.
Other provisions included within the Bill are the adoption of both Scots and Gaelic as official languages in Scotland, and the establishment of areas of linguistic significance in Gaelic communities, allowing ministers to focus grant funding in areas where Gaelic is most fragile.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel