GAELIC speakers are "equal citizens" and "deserve our respect", Kate Forbes has said after Andrew Marr described the use of the language on Lowlands signs as "ridiculous".
Veteran journalist Marr was speaking at an “In Conversation” event with Anas Sarwar at Labour conference this week when he said it was "offensive" to display the Gaelic language in areas where, he argued, it wasn't spoken.
The former BBC political editor went on: "Why does Haymarket [station] have to have the Gaelic for Haymarket under it? It’s ridiculous.
"The Scots are made up of many different peoples historically. Many different groups of people have come to Scotland and they brought different languages and I think we should let languages rest and prosper where they come from.”
READ MORE: Criticism for using Gaelic can be exhausting but it won’t stop me
Deputy First Minister Forbes, who also has responsibility for Gaelic and speaks the language herself, told The National that it is an important part of Scotland's identity.
She said: “Gaelic speakers are equal citizens and deserve our respect.
"Despite historic efforts to stigmatise and denigrate Gaelic speakers, the language remains a vitally important part of our cultural identity.
"We are taking a range of measures to support an increase in people speaking, using and learning the Gaelic language. If one of Scotland’s languages isn’t welcome here in Scotland, where will it be welcome?”
Kavanagh, who creates Gaelic maps, pointed out that the language was spoken historically across the country – not solely in the Highlands and Islands as Marr implied – with Fife, West Lothian, Dumfriesshire and Stirlingshire among the areas to record its use.
"Gaelic and Scots are very much still alive, despite the best efforts of Anglo-centric Scots to marginalise them," the campaigner wrote.
"The Gaelic language was not at one time merely spoken almost everywhere in Scotland, including the area of modern Edinburgh, it was also central to the very creation of Scotland as a nation. Without Gaelic there would be no Scotland, and Andrew Marr would have no 'Scottish Labour' event at which to display his ignorance."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel