A COMMUNITY group is calling for a review after its bid to buy an old kirk with connections to notorious grave snatchers Burke and Hare was rejected by the Church of Scotland.
Newton Parish Church in Danderhall was put up for sale earlier this year but locals were hoping they could purchase the historic site and repurpose it to hold weddings and funerals as well as teach the community about its rich history.
The church has been a part of Barbara Watson’s life for as long as she can remember. As well as getting married here, the graveyard holds a part of her family history.
READ MORE: Family pay tribute to woman who died in crash that also killed four horses
Speaking to STV News, Watson said: “It’s been contentious, historically been contentious, with the bulk of the people who lived around here.
“The miners, the agricultural workers, of which I am a descendant – my family still live in this area today.
“But in more modern times, I have been married here twice, my sisters were married here, my parents are still alive – they want to have a church service and be buried here.
“It’s such an integral part of the whole community.”
When it was announced the building would be going up for sale, the local community group – Friends of the Old Newton Parish Church – rallied together in the hopes of buying the small kirk and turning it into a community hub where they could preserve the building’s history.
However, their bid was rejected by the Church of Scotland.
“We need to retain our heritage,” said Helen Graham from Friends of the Old Newton Parish Church.
“This heritage is really special, this history is really special, so we don’t want that ripped apart.
“We want to keep it. We want to repurpose and retain that.”
READ MORE: Ambulances called with ‘five casualties’ after major crash on Scottish road
The church has a rich history, including a legend that it has a gravestone in the grounds which still bears the mark of a musket ball shot at Burke and Hare as they attempted to steal a body from its graveyard.
The Church of Scotland said that after receiving numerous offers for the kirk, the general trustees went with another Christian organisation – who were also the highest bidders.
A spokesperson for the Church of Scotland said: “We recognise that for the Friends their unsuccessful bid has caused disappointment and sadness, but as a charity, our decision must be in the best interest of the national and local church.
“We hope that some comfort can be taken from the fact that this decision will allow the building to remain open as a place of worship.”
The group are now calling for a review of the decision – over fears the church’s history and what it means to the community may be lost.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel