A HUMAN rights lawyer has branded the Scottish criminal justice system “institutionally racist” as he gave evidence at the Sheku Bayoh Inquiry.
Aamer Anwar also told the inquiry that providing free legal advice to the family of Mr Bayoh, who died in police custody, jeopardised his business.
Mr Bayoh, 31, a father of two, died after he was restrained on the ground by police officers in Kirkcaldy on May 3, 2015.
The inquiry has been investigating the circumstances of his death and whether race was a factor.
READ MORE: Man charged over fatal crash in which two teenagers died
His family were provided with pro-bono legal assistance by human rights lawyer Anwar for five years, before an inquiry was announced, and Anwar paid tribute to Mr Bayoh, who would have celebrated his 41st birthday on Monday, praising the family’s “tenacity and perseverance”.
Anwar (below), 56, branded the Scottish justice system “institutionally racist” and said “at least 50%” of his workload was taken up by the case.
He said he was warned by Imran Khan KC, who represented the family of murdered teenager Stephen Lawrence, “not to respond” to racism.
He also said he was warned by Michael Mansfield KC: “It’s fine for me, I’m white, I’m middle-class. I’m seen as a knight in shining armour who rides to the rescue of poor, vulnerable Black people. But when you do it, Aamer, or Imran does it, you’re playing the race card, you must be prepared to be attacked.”
READ MORE: 'Disgusting': Foreign Office panned over Lebanon evacuation efforts
Giving evidence in Edinburgh on Tuesday, Anwar said he had received death threats and had to move house because of his work, experienced paranoia and had been put under police surveillance, which he branded “unlawful” but said he had not made a formal complaint due to the risk of diverting attention from the case.
Anwar said he told the family “we cannot publicly mention the word racism”, which made them so angry they considered not instructing him, the inquiry heard, and that he advised them to trust in the Crown Office and Police Investigations and Review Commissioner (Pirc).
Anwar said: “Fundamentally, all of them failed to deliver justice. The criminal justice system in this country is institutionally racist.”
In a statement, Anwar said Kenny MacAskill, a former Scottish justice secretary, claimed he chose controversial cases as it was “good for business” – which Anwar rejected, saying that he feared his business “would not survive” due to the pressures of pro-bono work on the Bayoh case.
Anwar said: “People say you’re paranoid – I know exactly how they look at me and talk about me, and what they say about me behind my back. Imran Khan said ‘you will be attacked, they will come for you, do not respond because you will be falling into the trap of what the state does’.
READ MORE: Leading experts call on Keir Starmer to pull plug on Rosebank
“It wasn’t good for business, it was bad for business.”
He said the impact of the case had been “traumatic” and that he had been subjected to “attacks” professionally and had a nervous breakdown.
‘Because it’s the death of a Black man, there isn’t any outrage’
The inquiry heard Anwar warned the Bayoh family not to carry out door-to-door inquiries, expecting Pirc would – however, Anwar claimed it never happened.
He also said that a post-mortem examination which the family requested be postponed so family members could attend was carried out regardless.
Anwar said: “We now know police officers were present who shouldn’t have been present but the family weren’t entitled to be present.
“It was not an investigation into death in custody, it was amateur hour for Pirc.”
Anwar said he was advised of the possibility of police surveillance by Khan KC and that he found out during the inquiry it had happened.
He said: “I was subject to targeted surveillance. If this was a white lawyer doing the job I was doing would that be acceptable, or would there be uproar?
“Because it’s Aamer Anwar and the death of a Black man, there isn’t any outrage.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel