A MAJOR plan to transform the top of Glasgow's famous shopping street has been ditched in favour of major revisions.
The proposal - which was set to “replace” Buchannan Galleries with a multi-purpose shopping, residential and office quarter - was submitted by architects Foster and Partners, who is understood to no longer be attached to the development.
Buchanan Galleries' owner, Landsec, has since told The Architects' Journal it is now in favour of an "incremental" project and confirmed future plans will “retain” the current building as the “anchor” for a new district instead of demolish it.
In a recent annual report, the group stated: "This new approach will improve overall returns by retaining more of the existing income and growing this, alongside discrete development interventions.
"We are still finalising our plans, but this will likely result in less embodied carbon, lower risk and less capital intensive routes to realising the potential of these mixed-use estates."
The £800 million would have seen new public squares created, new streets with street-level entry to shops and Buchanan Street opened up through to Killermont Street and Buchanan Bus Station.
READ MORE: Petition launched to abolish peak rail fares in Scotland
A Landsec spokesperson said: "In Glasgow we are evolving our plans to focus more on masterplans that can be delivered in incremental phases. Alongside this we will seek to embrace opportunities to retain and reinvent existing buildings in our ambition to reduce embodied carbon."
The latest plan is the second set of designs to be scrapped. In 2015, BDP also scrapped their plans for the revamp which also included a potential change to the Royal Concert Hall steps.
Labour MSP Paul Sweeney, who has called for the steps remain as they are, reacted to the news, stating: "While their outline proposal to restore the traditional grid street plan in this part of the city centre was welcome, their plan to wreck a principal façade of Sir Leslie Martin’s final building, the Glasgow Royal Concert Hall, was deeply unwelcome and I hope that any revised approach will be more respectful to this civic landmark, which should be listed."
It is unclear whether New Practice, a Glasgow firm, and Michael Laird Architects remain on the job.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel