THE PROTESTER who was dragged out of Rachel Reeves’s speech at Labour conference by the neck has spoken out after it was revealed that the man responsible is a Labour councillor.
The National revealed today that Harbinder Singh (below), who represents the Ettingshall South and Spring Vale ward on Wolverhampton Council, is set to face a council investigation over the incident that happened last week.
The Wolverhampton Labour Group told The National today (Tuesday) it has “formally referred the matter to the Council’s Monitoring Officer”.
READ MORE: I'm the Labour conference protester – here's what really happened
“This matter is currently going through the appropriate procedures,” they added.
Now, the protester who was dragged by the neck – who previously spoke to The National on camera about what happened (below) and wishes to not be named – has said that this kind of violence is "unacceptable".
"Especially from a Labour councillor," he added.
"But it unfortunately seems to reflect the Labour Party's general attitudes towards voices of opposition – especially those speaking from a humanitarian standpoint.
“Whilst the government continues to sell arms to Israel, there will be mounting pressure from civil society on them to stop.
“Scenes like the one at the Labour conference only reaffirm the belief that the Government is desperate not to let opposition be heard. Could this be because it has no justification for its continued actions?”
The protester previously described the whole experience as “brutal”.
“There was a bit of grabbing on the neck, which was pretty shocking,” he said – showing a series of red marks on his neckline.
“I wasn't expecting that. And then also, the handcuffs caused a bit of damage on my wrist.”
It was a moment that dominated coverage of (above) Reeves’ maiden speech as Chancellor – where she attempted to strike a more optimistic tone about the UK’s economy after weeks of announcements of cuts.
But shortly after Reeves began her speech, the protester unfurled a banner reading “Still backing polluters, still arming Israel – we voted for change."
He then shouted "I thought we were voting for change Rachel”.
“It was brutal. We were right in the front with all of the delegates, the councillors – not a popular audience.”
When asked by The National why he chose to protest in this way at a high-profile event like Labour conference and the Chancellor’s speech, the protester said it was important to offer a “counter narrative” to Labour branding themselves as the self-styled “party of change”.
“There's some really important issues that they're not changing on,” he said.
“One is the continued licence and sale of arms to Israel whilst they're committing genocide on the Palestinian people.
“Another is the continued roll back on important green pledges – we know how urgent that situation is.”
In response to the interruption, Reeves said at the time: “This is a changed Labour Party, a Labour Party that represents working people, not a party of protest.”
The Labour Party and Wolverhampton Labour Group have been approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel