ANAS Sarwar has been called out for pledging more capital investment during the General Election campaign after it emerged ministers have been asked to make billions of pounds in cuts to infrastructure projects.
Despite Chancellor Rachel Reeves pledging to invest more to grow the economy, members of the Cabinet have been asked to model cuts to their investment plans of up to 10% of their annual capital spending as part of this month’s spending review, Government sources have told The Guardian.
The demands would mean big projects such as hospital improvements and defence projects being slowed down or stopped altogether as the Government looks for ways to repair what they say is a £22 billion black hole in the public finances.
READ MORE: Comment: Rachel Reeves is ignoring the obvious answer to 'black hole'
In a TV debate during the General Election campaign, Scottish Labour leader Sarwar turned to face First Minister John Swinney and said: “We have already committed more money to our public services, I’ve already set out how we would do more capital investment, we would borrow to do capital investment.”
The clip was unearthed on Twitter by pro-independence account MSM Monitor.
Rachel Reeves is planning to cut annual capital spending by 10%.
— MSM Monitor (@msm_monitor) October 1, 2024
During the general election campaign Anas Sarwar said Labour would borrow in order to pay for more capital spending. Looks like another Sarwar pledge is about to bite the dust. pic.twitter.com/mcZbI3mZFO
The account posted: “Rachel Reeves is planning to cut annual capital spending by 10%. During the general election campaign Anas Sarwar said Labour would borrow in order to pay for more capital spending.
“Looks like another Sarwar pledge is about to bite the dust.”
Sarwar has been repeatedly called out for his “no austerity” pledge during the election campaign before the UK Labour Government proceeded to cut the Winter Fuel Payment, with Keir Starmer saying the upcoming Budget would be “painful”.
READ MORE: Labour conference protester slams 'unacceptable violence'
On him pledging more capital investment, people have questioned why he is not now being challenged over “lies” he made during the campaign.
One user commented on the clip saying: “It's quite remarkable how little Sarwar has been challenged over his general election lies.”
Another said: “Sarwar is the branch manager of a single part of the party, what he promises [is] meaningless as he's not part of the party leadership.”
Economists have warned that cuts of this scale to capital spending could end up damaging the economy and the UK’s creaking public infrastructure.
Reeves (above) told the Labour conference last week: “It is time the Treasury moved on from just counting the costs of investment in our economy to recognising the benefits too. Growth is the challenge and investment is the solution.”
But Treasury officials argue that cutting spending on infrastructure in the short term is the only way to repair the gap quickly.
One Whitehall source told The Guardian: “We’re being told the Treasury wants to borrow more to invest in the long term but that does not cover the fact we’re being asked to make major capital spending cuts this year and next.”
Reeves will announce her first Budget as Chancellor on October 30.
Scottish Labour have been approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel