WHAT fitting reward for a historian whose vile rants about black people, Muslims, even the Hindu former prime minister Rishi Sunak have sparked numerous accusations of racism?
Well, if you’re Tory leadership hopeful Robert Jenrick, the right-wing historian David Starkey should be given a “dukedom”.
That’s right, in his quest to court the part of the Tory vote that obsessively tweet about race science and “Western values”, Jenrick when asked if he would give Starkey a peerage, replied: “I was thinking more of a dukedom.”
Before we dive into Starkey’s priors, it’s important to note that unless Jenrick thinks he is applying for the job of King – rather than leader of the opposition – he will have nothing to do with the creation of new dukedoms.
One thing that unites Ed Miliband, former Tory chancellor Sajid Javid (above) and National columnist Owen Jones – not normally a trio who’d agree on much – is that they’ve all accused Starkey of making racist comments.
Perhaps his crowning glory was when Starkey said that people shouldn’t “go on about slavery” and added that “slavery was not genocide, otherwise there wouldn't be so many damn blacks in Africa or in Britain”.
READ MORE: NTS doubles down on Neil Oliver defence amid David Starkey row
For this intervention, made in 2020, Starkey was booted off the board of charities, magazines. He lost roles at both Cambridge University and Canterbury Christ Church University, while Lancaster University revoked his honorary degree.
Publishers HarperCollins axed a book deal with him while Hodder and Soughton said they wouldn’t work with him again.
But for us here at The National, Starkey will always be remembered for his role in the downfall of Neil Oliver.
Amid the row over his “so many damn blacks” comments, it was found that Oliver (above) had previously declared his “love” for the historian. Those comments were by no means the first time Starkey had made controversial interventions on race.
He was at the time the president of the National Trust for Scotland. They defended him saying that in making that declaration of Starkey “love”, Oliver was “not representing the trust”.
Of course, shortly afterwards, he announced he was quitting the job.
So if we do end up with an ennobled Starkey, perhaps Oliver could be his footman.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel