SCOTLAND is home to hundreds of fascinating archaeological sites that allow us to delve back thousands of years into the past.
One such place is Skara Brae in Orkney – a 5000-year-old neolithic settlement that was uncovered during a terrible storm in 1850.
The location is said to be one of the "best-preserved" sites in Europe and paints a remarkable picture of life during this time.
Take a look at Skara Brae – the prehistoric village in Scotland that's older than the Pyramids
According to Historic Environment Scotland, it is "the best-preserved group of prehistoric houses in all of Western Europe" and contains a number of fascinating artefacts such as gaming dice, tools and jewellery.
The homes are said to be equipped with "fitted" furniture made from flat stone slabs set into large mounds of midden.
Each of the houses features a single room with a floor space of around 40sq m. Inside, there are box beds, central hearths and small tanks built into the floors.
It currently remains unknown why life at the village ended in around 2500 BCE. Some have argued that a huge sandstorm covered the houses while others remain convinced that the depopulation of the site was a gradual process.
As the settlement fell into decline, the construction of new sites such as the Stones of Stenness Circle and Henge began to take place across Orkney.
Recommended Reading:
See inside Scotland's oldest house, dating back to at least 1107
'Historic and charming': See inside Scotland's 'oldest' pub dating back to 1360
The archaeological site, which contains one fully reconstructed home, is a favourite spot for those visiting the area.
One user on Tripadvisor said: "What a stunning place to visit! The history goes back 5000 years but was only discovered in the 19th century.
"We hit on a glorious day which made it extra special. The beach alongside is stunning in the sun!"
Another added: "Being able to see the ancient dwellings up close and to touch these aged artefacts was beyond any words I could conjure to describe our visit!"
A third recommended the evening tour, writing that it is "well worth" the expense.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel