THE Scottish Government has delayed a plan for the Grangemouth refinery until next spring — just months before the site is due to be closed.
Bosses at the site announced on September 12 that Scotland’s only oil refinery would cease production by the second quarter of 2025 with hundreds of workers being laid off.
The decision drew both condemnation and worry from workers, trade unions and both the UK and Scottish governments – who urged owners Petroineos (Ineos) to reconsider.
READ MORE: Grangemouth: Oil refinery should not have been left to billionaires
The Scottish Government had been in the process of developing a just transition plan for Grangemouth before the announcement.
But on Thursday, climate minister Alasdair Allan (below) announced the plan would be delayed until next year.
“The Scottish Government has long understood the criticality of that wider Grangemouth cluster, and that is why we made a commitment to develop a just transition plan, which set a clear direction for the future of the whole site and recognised the need for that change in the future,” the minister said.
“Today, I’d like to update Parliament that we have taken the decision to introduce a short delay to the development of the Grangemouth plan.”
“In terms of the Grangemouth plan, that will allow us time to consider the recent refinery announcement and incorporate critical evidence from the Project Willow study, assuring alignment between these important pieces of work,” he said.
“We will launch our consultation on the draft plan shortly, with a view to delivering the final plan in the spring of next year.”
Allan went on to reiterate the Government’s “unwavering commitment” to a just transition at Grangemouth, despite the “disappointing” announcement from Petroineos.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel