PLANS for giant floating wind farms in Scotland threaten to destroy the country’s fishing sector, the leader of an industry body has warned.
The Scottish Fishermen’s Federation (SFF) said despite efforts to find a solution to the problem, mobile fishing, and floating offshore wind farms “are simply not able to co-exist”.
Speaking at the SFF’s annual dinner in Edinburgh – which was attended by First Minister John Swinney – Elspeth Macdonald said the renewable projects are an existential threat to jobs in the sector.
She warned the Scottish Government about “sleep-walking” into supporting an industry that she claimed could “destroy our world-class food production”.
READ MORE: Subscribe to The National for £10 to enjoy fantastic puzzles and perks
She told the audience at the Scotsman Hotel: “Our businesses will be completely excluded from areas that have been fished for generations, and the consequences of that – on businesses, on people, on the environment – are simply not known.
“The Government risks sleepwalking into a scenario where the ambition to lead the world on floating offshore wind means that it decimates or destroys our world-class food production.”
Macdonald said while talks with the Scottish Government have improved since the Bute House Agreement between the SNP and Greens ended, ministers must also do things differently.
She said the country needs “pragmatic policies that recognise and reflect the imperfect world we operate in, not red tape that ties both us and Government in knots”.
She added: “There have been very many meetings and very many words but we now need action – action from Government to support and protect our sector, because be in no doubt, it is a very serious risk from the planned expansion of floating offshore wind.”
Scotland became the home to the world’s first floating wind farm off the coast of Peterhead in Aberdeenshire in 2017.
The technology allows wind turbines to be installed further offshore in much deeper waters.
There are plans underway to build one of the largest offshore floating wind farms in the world 52 miles off Scotland’s east coast.
The 858 square mile Ossian project, a joint venture between SSE Renewables, Marubeni Corporation and Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners, could produce enough energy to power up to six million homes each year, according to developers.
Macdonald said she understands that a transition to renewable energy is needed.
“But we also need to eat,” she said. “We know that fishing is far more efficient in terms of greenhouse gas emissions than nearly all other forms of food production.
“We understand the ambitions of governments north and south of the border for reaching net zero goals through investment in renewables that will support jobs and growth, but that must not be to the detriment of our long-standing and world-class fishing industry.”
She said floating windfarms remain one of the biggest challenges facing fishermen.
She said the industry wants to see the Scottish Government “put its shoulder to the wheel in doing everything that it can to make sure our industry is not an accidental casualty of floating offshore wind”.
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: “A just transition must be at the heart of Scotland’s journey to net zero. We fully understand the need to balance the growth of the offshore renewables sector and protection for the marine environment, with continued investment in Scotland’s seafood and wider marine sectors and the communities and jobs which rely on them.
“As we progress with our marine plans, we will need to make the right choices about how we develop and use Scotland’s marine space sustainably; we will continue to engage closely with the fishing industry as we make those decisions.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel